Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25242395›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2015

Incorporation of detailed family history from the Swedish Family Cancer Database into the PCPT risk calculator.

Sonja Grill, Mahdi Fallah, Robin J Leach, Ian M Thompson, Stephen Freedland, Kari Hemminki, Donna P Ankerst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2016
    Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Family History of Breast or Prostate Cancer and Prostate Cancer Risk.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  15. Prostate cancer screening-when to start and how to screen?Translational andrology and urology · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sonja GrillDepartments of Life Sciences and Mathematics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Mahdi FallahSection of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Surgery (Urology) and Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Robin J LeachDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Cellular and Structural Biology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Ian M ThompsonDepartment of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.
Stephen FreedlandSection of Surgery, Durham Veterans Affairs Hospital and Department of Surgery (Urology) and Pathology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Kari HemminkiDivision of Molecular Genetic Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany; Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Donna P AnkerstDepartments of Life Sciences and Mathematics, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany; Department of Urology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. Electronic address: ankerst@uthscsa.edu.
Duke University Hospital · USTechnical University of Munich · DEThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USGerman Cancer Research Center · DE

Funding

TISSUE CULTURE---COREP30CA054174 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Lei Zheng · 1991 to 2026
$59.1M
SAN ANTONIO CENTER OF BIOMARKERS OF RISK FOR PROSTATE CAU01CA086402 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEACH, ROBIN JEAN, THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2000 to 2018
$33.1M
PCPT and SELECT cohorts: Core Infrastructure Support for Cancer Research UM1CA182883 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI TANGEN, CATHERINE M., THOMPSON, IAN M. · 2013 to 2017
$5.2M
NCI NIH HHS 5P30 CA0541474NCI NIH HHS P30 CA054174NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086402NCI NIH HHS U01CA86402NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA detailed family history provides an inexpensive alternative to genetic profiling for individual risk assessment. We updated the PCPT Risk Calculator to include detailed family histories. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study included 55,168 prostate cancer cases and 638,218 controls from the Swedish Family Cancer Database who were 55 years old or older in 1999 and had at least 1 male first-degree relative 40 years old or older and 1 female first-degree relative 30 years old or older. Likelihood ratios, calculated as the ratio of risk of observing a specific family history pattern in a prostate cancer case compared to a control, were used to update the PCPT Risk Calculator.

resultsHaving at least 1 relative with prostate cancer increased the risk of prostate cancer. The likelihood ratio was 1.63 for 1 first-degree relative 60 years old or older at diagnosis (10.1% of cancer cases vs 6.2% of controls), 2.47 if the relative was younger than 60 years (1.5% vs 0.6%), 3.46 for 2 or more relatives 60 years old or older (1.2% vs 0.3%) and 5.68 for 2 or more relatives younger than 60 years (0.05% vs 0.009%). Among men with no diagnosed first-degree relatives the likelihood ratio was 1.09 for 1 or more second-degree relatives diagnosed with prostate cancer (12.7% vs 11.7%). Additional first-degree relatives with breast cancer, or first-degree or second-degree relatives with prostate cancer compounded these risks.

conclusionsA detailed family history is an independent predictor of prostate cancer compared to commonly used risk factors. It should be incorporated into decision making for biopsy. Compared with other costly biomarkers it is inexpensive and universally available.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentSwedenbiopsybreast neoplasmsfamilylikelihood functionsprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID25242395
PMCPMC5034721
OpenAlexW2142306924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.