Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25242154›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2015

Courses of helping alliance in the treatment of people with severe mental illness in Europe: a latent class analytic approach.

Sabine Loos, Katrin Arnold, Mike Slade, Harriet Jordan, Valeria Del Vecchio, Gaia Sampogna, Ágnes Süveges, Marietta Nagy, Malene Krogsgaard Bording, Helle Østermark Sørensen and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mental health service users' responses to anticipated discrimination and the Time to Change program in England.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2020
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sabine LoosDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany, sabine.loos@uniklinik-ulm.de.
Katrin Arnold
Mike Slade
Harriet Jordan
Valeria Del Vecchio
Gaia Sampogna
Ágnes Süveges
Marietta Nagy
Malene Krogsgaard Bording
Helle Østermark Sørensen
Wulf Rössler
Wolfram Kawohl
Bernd Puschner
CEDAR study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe helping alliance (HA) between patient and therapist has been studied in detail in psychotherapy research, but less is known about the HA in long-term community mental health care. The aim of this study was to identify typical courses of the HA and their predictors in a sample of people with severe mental illness across Europe over a measurement period of one year.

methodsSelf-ratings of the HA by 588 people with severe mental illness who participated in a multicentre European study (CEDAR; ISRCTN75841675) were examined using latent class analysis.

resultsFour main patterns of alliance were identified: (1) high and stable (HS, 45.6 %), (2) high and increasing (HI, 36.9 %), (3) high and decreasing (HD, 11.3 %) and (4) low and increasing (LI, 6.1 %). Predictors of class membership were duration of illness, ethnicity, and education, receipt of state benefits, recovery, and quality of life.

conclusionsResults support findings from psychotherapy research about a predominantly stable course of the helping alliance in patients with severe mental illness over time. Implications for research and practice indicate to turn the attention to subgroups with noticeable courses.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultEuropeFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychotherapyQuality of Life

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.