Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25241804›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2015

Relationship between in vivo receptor occupancy and efficacy of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 allosteric modulators with different in vitro binding profiles.

Jerri M Rook, Mohammed N Tantawy, Mohammad S Ansari, Andrew S Felts, Shaun R Stauffer, Kyle A Emmitte, Robert M Kessler, Colleen M Niswender, J Scott Daniels, Carrie K Jones and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Revisiting the Radiosynthesis of [Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  5. ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Differential Pharmacology and Binding of mGluMolecular pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  8. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 - a promising target in drug development and neuroimaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Review
  13. Neurobiological Insights from mGlu Receptor Allosteric Modulation.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Review
  14. Partial mGlu₅ Negative Allosteric Modulators Attenuate Cocaine-Mediated Behaviors and Lack Psychotomimetic-Like Effects.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Synthesis ofJournal of fluorine chemistry · 2015
    Article
  18. Iodonium ylide-mediated radiofluorination of 18F-FPEB and validation for human use.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jerri M RookDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mohammed N Tantawy1] Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Sciences, Nashville, TN, USA [2] Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Mohammad S AnsariDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Andrew S FeltsDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Shaun R Stauffer1] Department of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA [2] Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Kyle A Emmitte1] Department of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA [2] Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Robert M KesslerDepartment of Radiology, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Colleen M NiswenderDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Scott DanielsDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Carrie K JonesDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Craig W Lindsley1] Department of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA [2] Department of Chemistry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
P Jeffrey ConnDepartment of Pharmacology and Vanderbilt Center for Neuroscience Drug Discovery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

REGULATION OF SIGNALING BY MGLUR5R01MH062646 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI P Jeffrey Conn, COLLEEN M NISWENDER · 2001 to 2026
$10.9M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
FUNCTIONS OF METABOTROPIC GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR01NS031373 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CONN, P JEFFREY · 1993 to 2025
$6.2M
Functions of Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor SubtypesR37NS031373 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI CONN, P JEFFREY · 2014 to 2020
$3.5M
PET System for Preclinical ResearchS10OD016245 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PETERSON, TODD E · 2013 to 2013
$584k
In Vivo Characterization of mGluR5 Positive Allosteric ModulatorsF32MH088234 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ROOK, JERRI MICHELLE · 2009 to 2012
$152k
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIH HHS S10 OD016245NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH088234NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH062646NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS031373NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS031373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allosteric modulators of the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 (mGlu5) have exciting potential as therapeutic agents for multiple brain disorders. Translational studies with mGlu5 modulators have relied on mGlu5 allosteric site positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands to assess receptor occupancy in the brain. However, recent structural and modeling studies suggest that closely related mGlu5 allosteric modulators can bind to overlapping but not identical sites, which could complicate interpretation of in vivo occupancy data, even when PET ligands and drug leads are developed from the same chemical scaffold. We now report that systemic administration of the novel mGlu5 positive allosteric modulator VU0092273 displaced the structurally related mGlu5 PET ligand, [(18)F]FPEB, with measures of in vivo occupancy that closely aligned with its in vivo efficacy. In contrast, a close analog of VU0092273 and [(18)F]FPEB, VU0360172, provided robust efficacy in rodent models in the absence of detectable occupancy. Furthermore, a structurally unrelated mGlu5 negative allosteric modulator, VU0409106, displayed measures of in vivo occupancy that correlated well with behavioral effects, despite the fact that VU0409106 is structurally unrelated to [(18)F]FPEB. Interestingly, all three compounds inhibit radioligand binding to the prototypical MPEP/FPEB allosteric site in vitro. However, VU0092273 and VU0409106 bind to this site in a fully competitive manner, whereas the interaction of VU0360172 is noncompetitive. Thus, while close structural similarity between PET ligands and drug leads does not circumvent issues associated with differential binding to a given target, detailed molecular pharmacology analysis accurately predicts utility of ligand pairs for in vivo occupancy studies.

Indexed as

Allosteric RegulationAmphetamineAnimalsBenzamidesCalciumCerebellumCorpus StriatumDose-Response Relationship, DrugHEK293 CellsHumansLocomotionMaleMaze LearningNiacinamidePiperidinesPositron-Emission TomographyAmphetamineBenzamidesCalciumN-cyclobutyl-6-((3-fluorophenyl)ethynyl)nicotinamideNiacinamidePiperidinesReceptor, Metabotropic Glutamate 5ThiazolesVU0092273VU0409106

Identifiers

PMID25241804
PMCPMC4289965
OpenAlexW2075237700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.