Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25241675›Full record

ReviewBehaviour research and therapy2014

Elevated reward-related neural activation as a unique biological marker of bipolar disorder: assessment and treatment implications.

Robin Nusslock, Christina B Young, Katherine S F Damme

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behaviour research and therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Lithium modulates striatal reward anticipation and prediction error coding in healthy volunteers.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robin NusslockDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA. Electronic address: nusslock@northwestern.edu.
Christina B YoungDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Katherine S F DammeDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

Funding

Risk for Bipolar Disorder: Reward-related Brain Function & Social RhythmsR01MH077908 · NIMH · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI ALLOY, LAUREN BERSH · 2007 to 2017
$5.7M
Symptom Dimension of Threat- and Reward-Related NeurocircuitryR01MH100117 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOOKHEIMER, SUSAN Y, CRASKE, MICHELLE G · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077908NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077908-01A1NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100117NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100117-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence indicates that risk for bipolar disorder is characterized by elevated activation in a fronto-striatal reward neural circuit involving the ventral striatum and orbitofrontal cortex, among other regions. It is proposed that individuals with abnormally elevated reward-related neural activation are at risk for experiencing an excessive increase in approach-related motivation during life events involving rewards or goal striving and attainment. In the extreme, this increase in motivation is reflected in hypomanic/manic symptoms. By contrast, unipolar depression (without a history of hypomania/mania) is characterized by decreased reward responsivity and decreased reward-related neural activation. Collectively, this suggests that risk for bipolar disorder and unipolar depression are characterized by distinct and opposite profiles of reward processing and reward-related neural activation. The objective of the present paper is threefold. First, we review the literature on reward processing and reward-related neural activation in bipolar disorder, and in particular risk for hypomania/mania. Second, we propose that reward-related neural activation reflects a biological marker of differential risk for bipolar disorder versus unipolar depression that may help facilitate psychiatric assessment and differential diagnosis. We also discuss, however, the challenges to using neuroscience techniques and biological markers in a clinical setting for assessment and diagnostic purposes. Lastly, we address the pharmacological and psychosocial treatment implications of research on reward-related neural activation in bipolar disorder.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBipolar DisorderBrainHumansMotivationRewardBiomarkersAssessmentBipolar disorderDepressionFronto-striatal neural circuitryRewardTreatment

Identifiers

PMID25241675
PMCPMC6727647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.