Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25240610›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2015

Short- and long term effects of epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality of esophageal cancer surgery.

Sebastian Heinrich, Katrin Janitz, Susanne Merkel, Peter Klein, Joachim Schmidt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04990713 (QORVATS Study. A Randomized Controlled, Triple Blinded to Compare the Quality of Recovery), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04990713 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

QORVATS Study. A Randomized Controlled, Triple Blinded to Compare the Quality of Recovery (QoR 40) Between Intercostal Block and a Combination of Intercostal Nerve Block With Serratus Plane Catheter for Patient's Undergoing VATS Procedures.

TypeinterventionalSponsorLondon Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph'sRan2022 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsVideo Assisted Thoracic Surgery (VATS), Pain ManagementArmsSerratus Plane Block (Local Anesthetic) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthetic), Serratus Plane Block (Placebo) and Intercostal Block (Local Anesthestic)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. [Epidural Analgesia in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Evidence and Practice].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sebastian HeinrichDepartment of Anesthesiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Krankenhausstraße 12, Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054, Bavaria, Germany, sebi_heinrich@gmx.de.
Katrin Janitz
Susanne Merkel
Peter Klein
Joachim Schmidt
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePerioperative regional anesthesia with consecutive reduction of intra- and postoperative systemic opioid requirements in order to improve oncological result after cancer surgery has only been addressed by a few reports. This hypothesis has never been proved in esophageal cancer with a long-term follow-up of more than 5 years. Therefore, we addressed the impact on short- and long-term outcomes of epidural analgesia for esophagus cancer surgery.

methodsAll available records from patients who underwent esophageal cancer surgery from 1995 to 2005 were retrospectively analyzed. Short- and long-term outcome variables including opioid requirements, duration of ICU-stay, survival, and cancer recurrence were compared between patients with and patients without epidural analgesia for abdomino-right-thoracic esophagectomy.

resultsOverall, the analysis included 153 patients, 118 received epidural analgesia; in 35 patients, epidural analgesia was avoided. We found significantly increased postoperative median opioid consumption (10-day intravenous morphine equivalent 187 versus 104 mg) and duration of ICU hospitalization (10.1 vs. 5.9 days, p < 0.05) in the non-epidural group compared with the epidural group. However, there were no significant differences in cancer recurrence (23 % non-epidural group, 27 % epidural group), 1-year mortality (14 vs. 11 %), or 5-year survival (29 vs. 28 %) between the two patient groups.

conclusionsThe results of our study underline the well-known clinical benefits of epidural analgesia for esophagus surgery. However, we found no evidence that the further oncological outcome is determined or significantly influenced by the presence or absence of epidural analgesia.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAdenocarcinomaAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID25240610
OpenAlexW2134924350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.