Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25239938›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2015

Developing a clinically relevant model of cognitive training after experimental traumatic brain injury.

Samuel W Brayer, Scott Ketcham, Huichao Zou, Max Hurwitz, Christopher Henderson, Jay Fuletra, Krishma Kumar, Elizabeth Skidmore, Edda Thiels, Amy K Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Training to Optimize Learning after Traumatic Brain Injury.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Samuel W BrayerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Scott KetchamDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Huichao ZouDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh.
Max HurwitzDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Christopher HendersonDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Jay FuletraDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Krishma KumarDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh.
Elizabeth SkidmoreDepartment of Occupational Therapy, University of Pittsburgh.
Edda ThielsDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh.
Amy K WagnerDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, University of Pittsburgh wagnerak@upmc.edu.

Funding

Developing Cognitive Training and Rehabilitation Paradigms for Experimental TBIR21HD071728 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WAGNER, AMY K · 2012 to 2013
$407k
NICHD NIH HHS 1R21HD071728NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD071728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFollowing traumatic brain injury (TBI), clinical cognitive training paradigms harness implicit and explicit learning and memory systems to improve function; however, these systems are differentially affected by TBI, highlighting the need for an experimental TBI model that can test efficacy of cognitive training approaches.

objectivesTo develop a clinically relevant experimental cognitive training model using the Morris water maze (MWM) wherein training on implicitly learned task components was provided to improve behavioral performance post-TBI.

methodsEighty-one adult male rats were divided by injury status (controlled cortical impact [CCI]/Sham), non-spatial cognitive training (CogTrained/No-CogTrained), and extra-maze cues (Cued/Non-Cued) during MWM testing. Platform latencies, thigmotaxis, and search strategies were assessed during MWM trials.

resultsCognitive training was associated with improved platform latencies, reduced thigmotaxis, and more effective search strategy use for Sham and CCI rats. In the Cued and Non-Cued MWM paradigm, there were no differences between CCI/CogTrained and Sham/No-CogTrained groups. During novel testing conditions, CogTrained groups applied implicitly learned knowledge/skills; however, sham-cued CogTrained/rats better incorporated extramaze cues into their search strategy than the CCI-Cued group. Cognitive training had no effects on contusion size or hippocampal cell survival.

conclusionsThe results provide evidence that CCI-CogTrained rats that learned the nonspatial components of the MWM task applied these skills during multiple conditions of the place-learning task, thereby mitigating cognitive deficits typically associated with this injury model. The results show that a systematic application of clinically relevant constructs associated with cognitive training paradigms can be used with experimental TBI to affect place learning.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesCognition DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyConditioning, PsychologicalCuesDisease Models, AnimalMaleMaze LearningNeuropsychological TestsPosturePsychomotor PerformanceRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReaction TimeSwimmingcognitive trainingcontrolled cortical impactimplicit learning and memoryMorris water mazetraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID25239938
PMCPMC4366353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.