Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25239906›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Prebiotic Oligosaccharides: Comparative Evaluation Using In Vitro Cultures of Infants' Fecal Microbiomes.

J Stiverson, T Williams, J Chen, S Adams, D Hustead, P Price, J Guerrieri, J Deacon, Z Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Effects of SynbioticFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. High-Fat Diet, Dysbiosis, and Gastrointestinal and Colonic Transit: Is There a Missing Link?Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2016
    Article
  13. Building a Beneficial Microbiome from Birth.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Genome of Bifidobacteria and Carbohydrate Metabolism.Korean journal for food science of animal resources · 2015
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J StiversonDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
T WilliamsDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA Abbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J ChenDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
S AdamsDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
D HusteadAbbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
P PriceAbbott Nutrition, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J GuerrieriInstitute of Clinical Research, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, USA.
J DeaconInstitute of Clinical Research, Mayfield Heights, Ohio, USA.
Z YuDepartment of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA yu.226@osu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6165-8522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to systematically assess the bifidogenic effect of three commonly used prebiotic products using in vitro cultures of infant fecal samples. Fresh stool samples collected from six term infants, each exclusively fed human milk (n = 3) or infant formula (n = 3), at 28 days of age were used as inocula. The following prebiotic products were added at concentrations applicable to infant formula: Vivinal GOS 15 (containing 28.5% galacto-oligosaccharide [GOS]) at 7.2 g/liter, Beneo HP (99.5% long-chain inulin [IN]) at 0.8 g/liter, Beneo Synergy 1 (enriched oligofructose and inulin [OF-IN]) at 4 g/liter, and a combination of Vivinal GOS 15 (7.2 g/liter) and Beneo HP (0.8 g/liter) (GOS-IN). The growth of total bacteria, Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium longum, and Escherichia coli was quantified using specific quantitative PCR (qPCR). Bifidobacterium was also enumerated on selective Beerens agar plates, with representative colonies identified by sequencing of their 16S rRNA genes. Volatile fatty acids (VFA) and pH in the cultures were also determined. Irrespective of the feeding methods, the GOS product, either alone or in combination with Beneo HP, resulted in substantially higher growth of total bifidobacteria, and much of this growth was attributed to growth of B. longum. Beneo Synergy 1 also increased the abundance of total bifidobacteria and B. longum. Corresponding to the increases in these two bacterial groups, acetic acid concentrations were higher, while there was a trend of lower E. coli levels and pH. The lower pH and higher acetic acid concentration might be directly responsible for the lower E. coli population. At the concentrations studied, the GOS product was more bifidogenic and potent in inhibiting E. coli than the other products tested. These results suggest that supplementation of infant formula with GOS may increase intestinal bifidobacteria and benefit infant health.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFatty AcidsFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationInfantIn Vitro TechniquesMicrobiotaOligosaccharidesPrebioticsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNADNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalFatty AcidsOligosaccharidesPrebioticsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25239906
PMCPMC4249200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.