Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25239902›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2014

Origin and effect of Alpha 2.2 Acetobacteraceae in honey bee larvae and description of Parasaccharibacter apium gen. nov., sp. nov.

Vanessa Corby-Harris, Lucy A Snyder, Melissa R Schwan, Patrick Maes, Quinn S McFrederick, Kirk E Anderson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Evolutionary trends inmSystems · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Gut microbiota of BrazilianbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Shotgun Metagenomics Reveals Minor Micro"International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  16. Analyzing Gut Microbial Community inJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. ThePathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vanessa Corby-HarrisCarl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, Arizona, USA Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA v.corbyharris@gmail.com.
Lucy A SnyderCarl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Melissa R SchwanCarl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Patrick MaesCarl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, Arizona, USA Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA Entomology and Insect Science GIDP, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Quinn S McFrederickDepartment of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, California, USA.
Kirk E AndersonCarl Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, Arizona, USA Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Agricultural Research Service · USCarl Hayden Bee Research Center · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The honey bee hive environment contains a rich microbial community that differs according to niche. Acetobacteraceae Alpha 2.2 (Alpha 2.2) bacteria are present in the food stores, the forager crop, and larvae but at negligible levels in the nurse and forager midgut and hindgut. We first sought to determine the source of Alpha 2.2 in young larvae by assaying the diversity of microbes in nurse crops, hypopharyngeal glands (HGs), and royal jelly (RJ). Amplicon-based pyrosequencing showed that Alpha 2.2 bacteria occupy each of these environments along with a variety of other bacteria, including Lactobacillus kunkeei. RJ and the crop contained fewer bacteria than the HGs, suggesting that these tissues are rather selective environments. Phylogenetic analyses showed that honey bee-derived Alpha 2.2 bacteria are specific to bees that "nurse" the hive's developing brood with HG secretions and are distinct from the Saccharibacter-type bacteria found in bees that provision their young differently, such as with a pollen ball coated in crop-derived contents. Acetobacteraceae can form symbiotic relationships with insects, so we next tested whether Alpha 2.2 increased larval fitness. We cultured 44 Alpha 2.2 strains from young larvae that grouped into nine distinct clades. Three isolates from these nine clades flourished in royal jelly, and one isolate increased larval survival in vitro. We conclude that Alpha 2.2 bacteria are not gut bacteria but are prolific in the crop-HG-RJ-larva niche, passed to the developing brood through nurse worker feeding behavior. We propose the name Parasaccharibacter apium for this bacterial symbiont of bees in the genus Apis.

Indexed as

AcetobacteraceaeAnimalsBeesDNA, BacterialLarvaMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSymbiosisDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID25239902
PMCPMC4249245
OpenAlexW2025559689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.