ArticleCirculation2014
Clinical trials in peripheral vascular disease: pipeline and trial designs: an evaluation of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.
Article in Circulation, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.
- Guideline
- Guideline
- Outcomes among patients with peripheral artery disease in the Aspirin Dosing: A Patient-Centric Trial Assessing Benefits and Long-Term Effectiveness (ADAPTABLE) study.Vascular medicine (London, England) · 2023Trial
- Peripheral Artery Disease: New Concepts, Treatments, and Disparities.Annual review of medicine · 2026Review
- Molecular insights from skin biopsies: Deciphering microvascular pathology in peripheral vascular diseases.World journal of experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Comparison of Aspirin and Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin in the Management of Stable Coronary Artery Disease or Peripheral Artery Disease: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of general medicine · 2022Review
- Updated analysis of pediatric clinical studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2008-2019.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- The Impact of platelet-fibrin clot strength on occurrence and clinical outcomes of peripheral artery disease in patients with significant coronary artery disease.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2020Article
- Article
- Review
- Advances in the Treatment of Stable Coronary Artery Disease and Peripheral Artery Disease.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2018Review
- Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in the Metabolic Myopathy Accompanying Peripheral Artery Disease.Frontiers in physiology · 2017Review
- Portfolio of prospective clinical trials including brachytherapy: an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov database.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2016Article
- Femoropopliteal Artery Stent Thrombosis: Report From the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease Registry.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2016Article
- Recent Publications by Ochsner Authors.Ochsner journal · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTremendous advances have occurred in therapies for peripheral vascular disease (PVD); until recently, however, it has not been possible to examine the entire clinical trial portfolio of studies for the treatment of PVD (both arterial and venous disease). METHODS AND
resultsWe examined interventional trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov from October 2007 through September 2010 (n=40,970) and identified 676 (1.7%) PVD trials (n=493 arterial only, n=170 venous only, n=13 both arterial and venous). Most arterial studies investigated lower-extremity peripheral artery disease and acute stroke (35% and 24%, respectively), whereas most venous studies examined deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolus prevention (42%) or venous ulceration (25%). A placebo-controlled trial design was used in 27% of the PVD trials, and 4% of the PVD trials excluded patients >65 years of age. Enrollment in at least 1 US site decreased from 51% of trials in 2007 to 41% in 2010. Compared with noncardiology disciplines, PVD trials were more likely to be double-blinded, to investigate the use of devices and procedures, and to have industry sponsorship and assumed funding source, and they were less likely to investigate drug and behavioral therapies. Geographic access to PVD clinical trials within the United States is limited to primarily large metropolitan areas.
conclusionsPVD studies represent a small group of trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, despite the high prevalence of vascular disease in the general population. This low number, compounded by the decreasing number of PVD trials in the United States, is concerning and may limit the ability to inform current clinical practice of patients with PVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.