Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25239295›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2014

A systematic review of qualitative research on the contributory factors leading to medicine-related problems from the perspectives of adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus.

A Al Hamid, M Ghaleb, H Aljadhey, Z Aslanpour

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06108674 (Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Telepharmacy on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Arterial Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06108674 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Telepharmacy on Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Arterial Hypertension: Celeste Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederal University of BahiaRan2023 to 2026Enrolled194ConditionsHypertensionArmsPharmaceutical care via telepharmacy and usual care, Pharmaceutical care in-person and usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research: the challenges and opportunities.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A Al HamidDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
M GhalebDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.
H AljadheyMedication Safety Research Chair, Clinical Pharmacy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Z AslanpourDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2567-0540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo synthesise contributing factors leading to medicine-related problems (MRPs) in adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or diabetes mellitus from their perspectives.

designA systematic literature review of qualitative studies regarding the contributory factors leading to MRPs, medication errors and non-adherence, followed by a thematic synthesis of the studies. DATA SOURCES: We screened Pubmed, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, PsycInfo, International Pharmaceutical Abstract and PsycExtra for qualitative studies (interviews, focus groups and questionnaires of a qualitative nature). REVIEW

methodsThematic synthesis was achieved by coding and developing themes from the findings of qualitative studies.

resultsThe synthesis yielded 21 studies that satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Three themes emerged that involved contributing factors to MRPs: patient-related factors including socioeconomic factors (beliefs, feeling victimised, history of the condition, lack of finance, lack of motivation and low self-esteem) and lifestyle factors (diet, lack of exercise/time to see the doctor, obesity, smoking and stress), medicine-related factors (belief in natural remedies, fear of medicine, lack of belief in medicines, lack of knowledge, non-adherence and polypharmacy) and condition-related factors (lack of knowledge/understanding, fear of condition and its complications, and lack of control).

conclusionsMRPs represent a major health threat, especially among adult patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or diabetes mellitus. The patients' perspectives uncovered hidden factors that could cause and/or contribute to MRPs in these groups of patients.

Indexed as

AdultCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes MellitusDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansQualitative ResearchCARDIOLOGYDIABETES & ENDOCRINOLOGYQUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Identifiers

PMID25239295
PMCPMC4170202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.