Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25239267›Full record

ReviewDrugs2014

Antiepileptic drugs for the treatment of agitation and aggression in dementia: do they have a place in therapy?

Damien Gallagher, Nathan Herrmann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damien GallagherSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada, gallagherdamien@hotmail.com.
Nathan Herrmann
Health Sciences Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are a class of medications that have received considerable attention as possible treatments for agitation and aggression in patients with dementia. This attention has been driven in equal measure by promising findings from limited trial and observational data and the desire to find treatments with improved tolerability. Their use, to date, has been largely confined to circumstances where first-line treatments have proven inadequate or are poorly tolerated. In recent years there has been some growth in the evidence base, and we can now make more informed recommendations regarding a number of older AEDs. Carbamazepine continues to have the best evidence to support its use, although the evidence base remains relatively small and concerns regarding tolerability limit its use. There is now more consistent evidence that valproate preparations should not be used for agitation and aggression in dementia. Despite a lack of high-quality data, some results have been reported for several newer medications, including levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, gabapentin, topiramate and lamotrigine, and a number of these warrant further investigation. Recent findings and implications for clinical practice are discussed.

Indexed as

AggressionAnticonvulsantsDementiaHumansPsychomotor AgitationAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID25239267
OpenAlexW2018201647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.