Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25237213›Full record

ArticleJournal of business and psychology2012

Guidelines for the Investigation of Mediating Variables in Business Research.

David P MacKinnon, Stefany Coxe, Amanda N Baraldi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of business and psychology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A Systematic Review of the Reporting Quality of Observational Studies That Use Mediation Analyses.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David P MacKinnonDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Stefany CoxeDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.
Amanda N BaraldiDepartment of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.

Funding

Estimating Mediation Effects in Prevention StudiesR37DA009757 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MACKINNON, DAVID P · 2015 to 2024
$3.5M
ESTIMATING MEDIATION EFFECTS IN PREVENTION STUDIESR01DA009757 · NIDA · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI MACKINNON, DAVID P · 1996 to 2013
$2.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA009757NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA009757
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Business theories often specify the mediating mechanisms by which a predictor variable affects an outcome variable. In the last 30 years, investigations of mediating processes have become more widespread with corresponding developments in statistical methods to conduct these tests. The purpose of this article is to provide guidelines for mediation studies by focusing on decisions made prior to the research study that affect the clarity of conclusions from a mediation study, the statistical models for mediation analysis, and methods to improve interpretation of mediation results after the research study. Throughout this article, the importance of a program of experimental and observational research for investigating mediating mechanisms is emphasized.

Indexed as

Causal inferenceConfidence intervalsIndirect effectsLongitudinal modelsMediationModerationSignificance testing

Identifiers

PMID25237213
PMCPMC4165346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.