Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25236852›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2014

Knowledge about tuberculosis among undergraduate health care students in 15 Italian universities: a cross-sectional study.

Maria Teresa Montagna, Christian Napoli, Silvio Tafuri, Antonella Agodi, Francesco Auxilia, Beatrice Casini, Maria Franca Coscia, Marcello Mario D'Errico, Margherita Ferrante, Angelo Fortunato and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. SIMED-New Doc course, a matter of reflection.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Teresa MontagnaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology-Hygiene Section, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy. mariateresa.montagna@uniba.it.
Christian Napoli
Silvio Tafuri
Antonella Agodi
Francesco Auxilia
Beatrice Casini
Maria Franca Coscia
Marcello Mario D'Errico
Margherita Ferrante
Angelo Fortunato
Cinzia Germinario
Domenico Martinelli
Giuseppe Michele Masanotti
Maria Fatima Massenti
Gabriele Messina
Paolo Montuori
Ida Mura
Giovanni Battista Orsi
Alessia Quaranta
Giovanni Sotgiu
Armando Stefanati
Stefano Tardivo
Maria Valeria Torregrossa
Anna Maria Tortorano
Licia Veronesi
Raffaele Zarrilli
Cesira Pasquarella
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Catania · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Parma · ITUniversity of Sassari · ITMarche Polytechnic University · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Foggia · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Siena · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Italian Study Group on Hospital Hygiene of the Italian Society of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health conducted a multicentre survey aiming to evaluate undergraduate health care students' knowledge of tuberculosis and tuberculosis control measures in Italy.

methodsIn October 2012-June 2013, a sample of medical and nursing students from 15 Italian universities were enrolled on a voluntary basis and asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire investigating both general knowledge of tuberculosis (aetiology, clinical presentation, outcome, screening methods) and personal experiences and practices related to tuberculosis prevention. Data were analysed through multivariable regression using Stata software.

resultsThe sample consisted of 2,220 students in nursing (72.6%) and medicine (27.4%) courses. Our findings clearly showed that medical students had a better knowledge of tuberculosis than did nursing students.Although the vast majority of the sample (up to 95%) answered questions about tuberculosis aetiology correctly, only 60% of the students gave the correct responses regarding clinical aspects and vaccine details. Overall, 66.9% of the students had been screened for tuberculosis, but less than 20% of those with a negative result on the tuberculin skin test were vaccinated. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age and type of study programme (nursing vs. medical course) were determinants of answering the questions correctly.

conclusionsAlthough our data showed sufficient knowledge on tuberculosis, this survey underlines the considerable need for improvement in knowledge about the disease, especially among nursing students. In light of the scientific recommendations concerning tuberculosis knowledge among students, progress of current health care curricula aimed to develop students' skills in this field is needed.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleStudents, MedicalStudents, NursingSurveys and QuestionnairesTuberculosisUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25236852
PMCPMC4192330
OpenAlexW2131995938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.