ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2014
Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior.
Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 350 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
350 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,069 citations in OpenAlex.
- Problem Solving and Emotion Coping Styles for Social Anxiety: A Meta-analysis of Chinese Mainland Students.Child psychiatry and human development · 2025Pooled it
- Emotion Recognition Deficits in Children and Adolescents with Psychopathic Traits: A Systematic Review.Clinical child and family psychology review · 2024Pooled it
- The level and determinants of empathy among medical students from Arabic speaking countries: A systematic review.GMS journal for medical education · 2024Pooled it
- An umbrella review of candidate predictors of response, remission, recovery, and relapse across mental disorders.Molecular psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Perception of Social and Educational Quality of Life of Minors Diagnosed with Rare Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Pooled it
- Measurement properties of pain scoring instruments in farm animals: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Individualized Prediction of Females' Empathic Concern from Intrinsic Brain Activity within General Network of State Empathy.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2022Pooled it
- Investigating the Impact of a Virtual Reality Experience on Medical Student Empathy: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Impact of Conversational and Animation Features of a Mental Health App Virtual Agent on Depressive Symptoms and User Experience Among College Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mental health · 2025Trial
- Female Cerebellum Seems Sociable; An iTBS Investigation.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Trial
- Perceptions of grief reactions in family members of incarcerated individuals: A vignette-based experiment.Death studies · 2023Trial
- Empathy profiles in posttraumatic stress disorder: A person-centered approach to understanding emotion dysregulation and psychopathology.Journal of affective disorders · 2026Article
- Properties of the Persian Version of the Societal Attitudes Towards Autism (SATA) Scale Among Iranian University Students.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2026Article
- Do Physicians CARE? Psychometric Validation of the Portuguese Self-Report Version of the CARE Measure.Evaluation & the health professions · 2026Article
- How an Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology Clerkship Affects Medical Students' HIV/AIDS Knowledge and Attitudes.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Psychometric Validation of an Arabic-Language Version of the Pictorial Empathy Test (PET) and the Single-Item Trait Empathy Scale (SITES) in a Tunisian Young Adult Sample.International journal of methods in psychiatric research · 2026Article
- Gender-specific interpersonal neural synchronization during same-gender closeness-building interactions among strangers: an fNIRS hyperscanning study.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- The Effect of Sex and Gender-Role on Social Attention: Investigating the Association With Social Skills and Academic Preferences.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026Article
- Gender-Patterns in Cyberbullying Involvement Categories: Insights into the Cyberbully/Victims Subgroup.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Role of Parenting Styles and Empathy in the Perpetration of Cyberbullying in a Sample of Adolescents.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
290 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence suggests that there are differences in the capacity for empathy between males and females. However, how deep do these differences go? Stereotypically, females are portrayed as more nurturing and empathetic, while males are portrayed as less emotional and more cognitive. Some authors suggest that observed gender differences might be largely due to cultural expectations about gender roles. However, empathy has both evolutionary and developmental precursors, and can be studied using implicit measures, aspects that can help elucidate the respective roles of culture and biology. This article reviews evidence from ethology, social psychology, economics, and neuroscience to show that there are fundamental differences in implicit measures of empathy, with parallels in development and evolution. Studies in nonhuman animals and younger human populations (infants/children) offer converging evidence that sex differences in empathy have phylogenetic and ontogenetic roots in biology and are not merely cultural byproducts driven by socialization. We review how these differences may have arisen in response to males' and females' different roles throughout evolution. Examinations of the neurobiological underpinnings of empathy reveal important quantitative gender differences in the basic networks involved in affective and cognitive forms of empathy, as well as a qualitative divergence between the sexes in how emotional information is integrated to support decision making processes. Finally, the study of gender differences in empathy can be improved by designing studies with greater statistical power and considering variables implicit in gender (e.g., sexual preference, prenatal hormone exposure). These improvements may also help uncover the nature of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders in which one sex is more vulnerable to compromised social competence associated with impaired empathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.