ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2014
Lipidomic profiling at the interface of metabolic surgery and cardiovascular disease.
Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multi-omics approaches in psychoneuroimmunology and health research: Conceptual considerations and methodological recommendations.Brain, behavior, and immunity · 2023Article
- Urinary Lipidomics: evidence for multiple sources and sexual dimorphism in healthy individuals.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2018Article
- Bariatric Surgery-Induced Cardiac and Lipidomic Changes in Obesity-Related Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2018Article
- Lipidomics: Techniques, Applications, and Outcomes Related to Biomedical Sciences.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2016Review
- Nutrigenomics, the Microbiome, and Gene-Environment Interactions: New Directions in Cardiovascular Disease Research, Prevention, and Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bariatric surgery has helped patients attain not only significant and sustained weight loss but has also proved to be an effective means of mitigating or reversing various obesity-related comorbidities. The impressive rates of remission or resolution of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) following bariatric surgery are well documented and have rightly received great attention. Less understood are the effects of bariatric surgery on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and its underlying risk factors. Thanks to the availability of increasingly sensitive laboratory tools, the emerging science of lipidomics and metagenomics is poised to offer significant contributions to our understanding of metabolically induced vascular diseases. They are set to identify novel mechanisms explaining how the varied approaches of bariatric surgery produce the remarkable improvements in multiple organs observed during patient follow-up. This article reviews recent and novel findings in patients through the lens of lipidomics with an emphasis on CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.