ArticleClinical cardiology2014
Predictors and outcome of sustained improvement in left ventricular function in dilated cardiomyopathy.
Article in Clinical cardiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02770443 (Withdrawal of Beta- Blockers and ACE Inhibitors After Left Ventricular Systolic Function Recovery in Patient With Dilated Cardiomyopathy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Withdrawal of Beta- Blockers and ACE Inhibitors After Left Ventricular Systolic Function Recovery in Patient With Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Control Trial.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Baseline Predictors of Early Ventricular Recovery During Hospitalization in Children with Dilated Cardiomyopathy: A Short-Term Retrospective Study.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Beyond initial recovery: Heart failure with transientWorld journal of cardiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Late gadolinium enhancement for re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Dilated cardiomyopathy with re-worsening left ventricular ejection fraction.Heart and vessels · 2019Article
- Fibrosis and Fibrotic Gene Expression in Pediatric and Adult Patients With Idiopathic Dilated Cardiomyopathy.Journal of cardiac failure · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImprovement in the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) may occur in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). HYPOTHESIS: There are different implications of persistent versus transient improvement in LVEF among DCM patients receiving contemporary therapy.
methodsWe studied 188 patients with nonischemic DCM. Persistent improvement in LVEF (PIEF) was defined as LVEF increase by at least 10% compared to baseline, and found in 2 separate echo-Doppler exams performed at least 12 months apart. Increased LVEF in echo 2, which was not sustained in echo 3, was defined as transient improvement in LVEF (TIEF).
resultsOver an average follow-up of 6.8 years, PIEF occurred in 61 (33%) patients, predicting a better long-term outcome (P < 0.001) in a combined end-point comprising death, heart transplantation, or the need for a ventricular assist device. The TIEF group had an intermediate course and were closer to nonimprovers (P = 0.003 vs PIEF). Multivariate logistic regression identified the following independent predictors of PIEF: shorter disease duration, pregnancy-associated disease, left ventricular hypertrophy, and baseline LVEF ≤ 25%. A score to predict PIEF assigned 1 point to each of the following: disease duration < 3 years and no familial cardiomyopathy; pregnancy-associated presentation; basal LVEF ≤ 25%; and left ventricular wall thickness ≥ 12. A score of ≥ 3 was present in 44% of the patients, reliably predicting PIEF in 91% (P = 0.01).
conclusionsPersistent improvement in LVEF is associated with improved long-term prognosis. Baseline clinical parameters can be used to identify patients likely to demonstrate PIEF, thereby allowing tailored management in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.