Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25236499›Full record

ArticleHead and neck pathology2015

Mutation and Transcriptional Profiling of Formalin-Fixed Paraffin Embedded Specimens as Companion Methods to Immunohistochemistry for Determining Therapeutic Targets in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OPSCC): A Pilot of Proof of Principle.

Nabil F Saba, Malania Wilson, Gregory Doho, Juliana DaSilva, R Benjamin Isett, Scott Newman, Zhuo Georgia Chen, Kelly Magliocca, Michael R Rossi

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Head and neck pathology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Genomic landscape of human papillomavirus-associated cancers.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nabil F SabaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Oncology Program, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA, nfsaba@emory.edu.
Malania Wilson
Gregory Doho
Juliana DaSilva
R Benjamin Isett
Scott Newman
Zhuo Georgia Chen
Kelly Magliocca
Michael R Rossi
Emory University · USIgenbio (United States) · US

Funding

Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
A Novel genomics-based approach to differentiate HPV-positive and -negative HNCR21CA182661 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI CHEN, ZHUO GEORGIA, SABA, NABIL F · 2014 to 2015
$373k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292NCI NIH HHS R21 CA182661
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of molecular methods in the diagnosis of head and neck cancer is rapidly evolving and holds great potential for improving outcomes for all patients who suffer from this diverse group of malignancies . However, there is considerable debate as to the best clinical approaches, particularly for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). The choices of NGS methods such as whole exome, whole genome, whole transcriptomes (RNA-Seq) or multiple gene resequencing panels, each have strengths and weakness based on data quality, the size of the data, the turnaround time for data analysis, and clinical actionability. There have also been a variety of gene expression signatures established from microarray studies that correlate with relapse and response to treatment, but none of these methods have been implemented as standard of care for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Because many genomic methodologies are still far from the capabilities of most clinical laboratories, we chose to explore the use of a combination of off the shelf targeted mutation analysis and gene expression analysis methods to complement standard anatomical pathology methods. Specifically, we have used the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq cancer panel in combination with the NanoString nCounter Human Cancer Reference Kit on 8 formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) OPSCC tumor specimens, (4) HPV-positive and (4) HPV-negative. Differential expression analysis between HPV-positive and negative groups showed that expression of several genes was highly likely to correlate with HPV status. For example, WNT1, PDGFA and OGG1 were all over-expressed in the positive group. Our results show the utility of these methods with routine FFPE clinical specimens to identify potential therapeutic targets which could be readily applied in a clinical trial setting for clinical laboratories lacking the instrumentation or bioinformatics infrastructure to support comprehensive genomics workflows. To the best of our knowledge, these preliminary experiments are among the earliest to combine both mutational and gene expression profiles using Ion Torrent and NanoString technologies. This reports serves as a proof of principle methodology in OPSCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Squamous CellDNA GlycosylasesDNA Mutational AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunohistochemistryMutationOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomaviridaePilot ProjectsPlatelet-Derived Growth FactorTranscription, GeneticAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorDNA Glycosylasesoxoguanine glycosylase 1, humanPlatelet-Derived Growth Factorplatelet-derived growth factor AWnt1 ProteinWNT1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25236499
PMCPMC4424213
OpenAlexW2019421021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.