Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25236455›Full record

ArticleGenetics2014

Bayesian modeling of haplotype effects in multiparent populations.

Zhaojun Zhang, Wei Wang, William Valdar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of Candidate Risk Factor Genes for Human Idelalisib Toxicity Using a Collaborative Cross Approach.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Using Heterogeneous Stocks for Fine-Mapping Genetically Complex Traits.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhaojun ZhangDepartment of Computer Science, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
Wei WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095.
William ValdarDepartment of Genetics and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 william.valdar@unc.edu.

Funding

Statistical Modeling of Complex Traits in Genetic Reference Super-PopulationsR01GM104125 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI VALDAR, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2016
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104125NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM104125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A general Bayesian model, Diploffect, is described for estimating the effects of founder haplotypes at quantitative trait loci (QTL) detected in multiparental genetic populations; such populations include the Collaborative Cross (CC), Heterogeneous Socks (HS), and many others for which local genetic variation is well described by an underlying, usually probabilistically inferred, haplotype mosaic. Our aim is to provide a framework for coherent estimation of haplotype and diplotype (haplotype pair) effects that takes into account the following: uncertainty in haplotype composition for each individual; uncertainty arising from small sample sizes and infrequently observed haplotype combinations; possible effects of dominance (for noninbred subjects); genetic background; and that provides a means to incorporate data that may be incomplete or has a hierarchical structure. Using the results of a probabilistic haplotype reconstruction as prior information, we obtain posterior distributions at the QTL for both haplotype effects and haplotype composition. Two alternative computational approaches are supplied: a Markov chain Monte Carlo sampler and a procedure based on importance sampling of integrated nested Laplace approximations. Using simulations of QTL in the incipient CC (pre-CC) and Northport HS populations, we compare the accuracy of Diploffect, approximations to it, and more commonly used approaches based on Haley-Knott regression, describing trade-offs between these methods. We also estimate effects for three QTL previously identified in those populations, obtaining posterior intervals that describe how the phenotype might be affected by diplotype substitutions at the modeled locus.

Indexed as

HaplotypesModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsBayes TheoremMiceMice, Inbred StrainsCollaborative Crossgenetic architecturehaplotype effectsheterogeneous stocksmixed modelsMPPMultiparent Advanced Generation Inter-Cross (MAGIC)Multiparental populationsmultiparent linesQTL mapping

Identifiers

PMID25236455
PMCPMC4174926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.