Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25234992›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2014

Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions predicts susceptibility to acoustic over-exposure in alert rabbits.

Anne E Luebke, Barden B Stagner, Glen K Martin, Brenda L Lonsbury-Martin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Cochlear hair cell densities in the rabbit.Anatomical science international · 2019
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Otoacoustic-emission-based medial-olivocochlear reflex assays for humans.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2014
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne E LuebkeDepartments of Neurobiology and Anatomy and Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York 14534.
Barden B StagnerResearch Service, Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, California 92357.
Glen K MartinResearch Service, Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, California 92357.
Brenda L Lonsbury-MartinResearch Service, Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, California 92357.
VA Loma Linda Healthcare System · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION COCHLEOGRAPHYR01DC000613 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, GLEN K. · 1989 to 2013
$5.0M
Molecular biology of cochlear efferent receptorsR01DC003086 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI LUEBKE, ANNE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.5M
PHYSIOLOGICAL BASES OF OTOTRAUMATIC INSULTR01DC003114 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI MARTIN, GLEN K. · 1996 to 2005
$1.9M
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF COCHLEAR EFFERENT RECEPTORSR29DC003086 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI LUEBKE, ANNE E · 1996 to 2000
$112k
NIDCD NIH HHS DC000613NIDCD NIH HHS DC003086NIDCD NIH HHS DC003114NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000613NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003086NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC003114NIDCD NIH HHS R29 DC003086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A noninvasive test was developed in rabbits based on fast adaptation measures for 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The goal was to evaluate the effective reflex activation, i.e., "functional strength," of both the descending medial olivocochlear efferent reflex (MOC-R) and the middle-ear muscle reflex (MEM-R) through sound activation. Classically, it is assumed that both reflexes contribute toward protecting the inner ear from cochlear damage caused by noise exposure. The DP-gram method described here evaluated the MOC-R effect on DPOAE levels over a two-octave (oct) frequency range. To estimate the related activation of the middle-ear muscles (MEMs), the MEM-R was measured by monitoring the level of the f1-primary tone throughout its duration. Following baseline measures, rabbits were subjected to noise over-exposure. A main finding was that the measured adaptive activity was highly variable between rabbits but less so between the ears of the same animal. Also, together, the MOC-R and MEM-R tests showed that, on average, DPOAE adaptation consisted of a combined contribution from both systems. Despite this shared involvement, the amount of DPOAE adaptation measured for a particular animal's ear predicted that ear's subsequent susceptibility to the noise over-exposure for alert but not for deeply anesthetized rabbits.

Indexed as

ArousalOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousReflex, AcousticAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory FatigueAuditory PathwaysCochleaEar, MiddleFeedback, PsychologicalNoiseOlivary NucleusRabbitsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25234992
PMCPMC4167750
OpenAlexW2074482719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.