Trial reportMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2014
Predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of cetuximab combined with cisplatin and capecitabine in advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicenter phase 2 trial.
Trial report in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00477711 (A Study of Cetuximab), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Study of Cetuximab(Erbitux) With Cisplatin and Capecitabine(Xeloda)as 1st Line Treatment in the Advanced Gastric Cancer
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted therapy and immunotherapy for gastric cancer: rational strategies, novel advancements, challenges, and future perspectives.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Potential diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Regulation of regulatory T cells and tumor-associated macrophages in gastric cancer tumor microenvironment.Cancer medicine · 2024Review
- Research progress in targeted therapy and immunotherapy for gastric cancer.Chinese medical journal · 2022Review
- Review
- Impact of pain care and hospice care on quality of life in patients with advanced gastric cancer.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- The design, analysis and application of mouse clinical trials in oncology drug development.BMC cancer · 2019Article
- New therapeutic options opened by the molecular classification of gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Review
- Influence of the HER receptor ligand system on sensitivity to cetuximab and trastuzumab in gastric cancer cell lines.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017Article
- Panitumumab in combination with modified docetaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinomas: a multicenter phase II study by the Hellenic Oncology Research Group.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cetuximab presents a potential therapy for gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of potential biomarkers of cetuximab efficacy. In this prospective phase 2 trial (NCT00477711), we enrolled untreated 47 patients with un-resectable or metastatic gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma from seven sites in China. Patients with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma were given cisplatin (80 mg/m2, triweekly), capecitabine (2,000 mg/m2, triweekly for 2 weeks), and cetuximab weekly (400 mg/m2 at first infusion and 250 mg/m2 subsequently). Sample size was calculated using Simon's two-stage design. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and predictive biomarkers. The ORR was 53.2%, median PFS 5.2 months, and OS 10.8 months. The most frequent toxicities included neutropenia (25.0%), nausea/vomiting (11.5%), and rash/desquamation (9.6%). Patients with grade 2-4 rash achieved a significantly better ORR, longer PFS, and OS than those with grade 0-1 rash. Seven patients (15.9%) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) strong expression (3+) showed great tumor shrinkage, longer PFS (7.1 months), and OS (16.6 months). EGFR gene amplification was detected in four patients (8.5%), all of whom responded well. Compared to patients with lower levels of transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-α), those with high levels showed better response and longer PFS (6.0 vs 2.7 months, p=0.001) and OS (12.9 vs 7.0 months, p=0.001). C+XP was well tolerated and effective for advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma as first-line therapy. Severity of skin rash and TGF-α level correlated with efficacy, and EGFR overexpression might predict cetuximab efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.