Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25234821›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2014

Myocardial drug distribution generated from local epicardial application: potential impact of cardiac capillary perfusion in a swine model using epinephrine.

Mikhail Y Maslov, Elazer R Edelman, Matthew J Pezone, Abraham E Wei, Matthew G Wakim, Michael R Murray, Hisashi Tsukada, Iraklis S Gerogiannis, Adam Groothuis, Mark A Lovich

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Establishment of a rabbit model of small diameter vascular graft replacement].Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail Y MaslovDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: mikhail.maslov@steward.org.
Elazer R EdelmanHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: ere@mit.edu.
Matthew J PezoneDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: matthew.pezone@steward.org.
Abraham E WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: ewei@une.edu.
Matthew G WakimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: Matthew.Wakim@bmc.org.
Michael R MurrayDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: mrmcapecod@gmail.com.
Hisashi TsukadaDepartment of Surgery, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: Hisashi.Tsukada@steward.org.
Iraklis S GerogiannisDepartment of Surgery, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: GerogiannisI@southcoast.org.
Adam GroothuisHarvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Electronic address: AGroothuis@mitralign.com.
Mark A LovichDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02135, USA. Electronic address: mark.lovich@steward.org.
Tufts University · USHarvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology · US

Funding

Vascular Drug Delivery - Supplement for EquipmentR01GM049039 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI EDELMAN, ELAZER R · 1994 to 2019
$8.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM049039NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM 49039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prior studies in small mammals have shown that local epicardial application of inotropic compounds drives myocardial contractility without systemic side effects. Myocardial capillary blood flow, however, may be more significant in larger species than in small animals. We hypothesized that bulk perfusion in capillary beds of the large mammalian heart not only enhances drug distribution after local release, but also clears more drug from the tissue target than in small animals. Epicardial (EC) drug releasing systems were used to apply epinephrine to the anterior surface of the left heart of swine in either point-sourced or distributed configurations. Following local application or intravenous (IV) infusion at the same dose rates, hemodynamic responses, epinephrine levels in the coronary sinus and systemic circulation, and drug deposition across the ventricular wall, around the circumference and down the axis, were measured. EC delivery via point-source release generated transmural epinephrine gradients directly beneath the site of application extending into the middle third of the myocardial thickness. Gradients in drug deposition were also observed down the length of the heart and around the circumference toward the lateral wall, but not the interventricular septum. These gradients extended further than might be predicted from simple diffusion. The circumferential distribution following local epinephrine delivery from a distributed source to the entire anterior wall drove drug toward the inferior wall, further than with point-source release, but again, not to the septum. This augmented drug distribution away from the release source, down the axis of the left ventricle, and selectively toward the left heart follows the direction of capillary perfusion away from the anterior descending and circumflex arteries, suggesting a role for the coronary circulation in determining local drug deposition and clearance. The dominant role of the coronary vasculature is further suggested by the elevated drug levels in the coronary sinus effluent. Indeed, plasma levels, hemodynamic responses, and myocardial deposition remote from the point of release were similar following local EC or IV delivery. Therefore, the coronary vasculature shapes the pharmacokinetics of local myocardial delivery of small catecholamine drugs in large animal models. Optimal design of epicardial drug delivery systems must consider the underlying bulk capillary perfusion currents within the tissue to deliver drug to tissue targets and may favor therapeutic molecules with better potential retention in myocardial tissue.

Indexed as

AlginatesAnimalsCapillariesCoronary CirculationDrug Delivery SystemsEpinephrineExcipientsHeart RateHeart VentriclesInfusions, IntravenousMyocardial ContractionMyocardiumPericardiumPoloxamerSwineTissue DistributionAlginatesEpinephrineExcipientsPoloxamerVasoconstrictor AgentsContractilityEpicardial drug deliveryInotropeMyocardial drug distributionSystemic vascular resistance

Identifiers

PMID25234821
PMCPMC4252373
OpenAlexW2016273702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.