Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25234477›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2015

Physician Risk Assessment Knowledge Regarding BRCA Genetics Testing.

Jason Cohn, William Blazey, David Tegay, Brian Harper, Sharon Koehler, Brookshield Laurent, Vivian Chan, Min-Kyung Jung, Bhuma Krishnamachari

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04738708 (Telegenetics or In-Person Genetic Counselling), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04738708 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Telegenetics or In-Person Genetic Counselling: A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost

TypeobservationalSponsorNational Cancer Centre, SingaporeRan2021 to 2026Enrolled150ConditionsGenetic CounsellingArmsPatients referred to CGS at NCCS for HBOC or Lynch syndrome pre-test genetic counselling.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Primary care provider practices, attitudes, and confidence with hereditary cancer risk assessment and testing: A mixed methods study.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  3. A Survey of the Awareness and Educational Needs of Nurses in Nagasaki Prefecture Regarding Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Georgia Primary Care Providers' Knowledge of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jason CohnAcademic Medicine Scholars Program, NYIT College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY, 11548, USA.
William Blazey
David Tegay
Brian Harper
Sharon Koehler
Brookshield Laurent
Vivian Chan
Min-Kyung Jung
Bhuma Krishnamachari
New York Institute of Technology · USSUNY Old Westbury · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aim was to evaluate the association between genetics referrals, training in medical school, residency, or continuing medical education and physician knowledge of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC). A survey of 55 questions was administered to 140 physicians evaluating knowledge and practice patterns regarding HBOC. Physicians with genetics training during residency were more likely to recognize that most instances of ovarian cancer are not hereditary (odds ratio (OR) = 3.16; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.32, 7.58). Physicians with continuing medical education (CME) training on genetics were more likely to identify that screening can be improved for those with a hereditary mutation (OR = 4.28; 95 % CI 1.32, 13.90). Primary care physicians who frequently referred for genetics were more likely to recognize that maternal history is not more important than paternal history (OR = 2.51; 95 % CI 1.11, 5.66), that screening can be improved for those with hereditary risk (OR = 4.06; 95 % CI 1.08, 15.22), and that females with a hereditary breast cancer risk would have different recommendations for screening than someone without this risk (OR = 4.91; 95 % CI 1.04, 23.25). Our data suggest that training and frequency of genetics referrals may be associated with knowledge of general risk assessment for HBOC.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePhysiciansAdultBreast NeoplasmsEducation, MedicalEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleGenes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2HumansInternship and ResidencyMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID25234477
OpenAlexW2062387173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.