Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25234288›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2015

Comprehensive analysis of RET and ROS1 rearrangement in lung adenocarcinoma.

Seung Eun Lee, Boram Lee, Mineui Hong, Ji-Young Song, Kyungsoo Jung, Maruja E Lira, Mao Mao, Joungho Han, Jhingook Kim, Yoon-La Choi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. JTO clinical and research reports · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cancers · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Rare molecular subtypes of lung cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Seung Eun LeeDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Boram LeeDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Mineui HongDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Ji-Young Song1] Laboratory of Cancer Genomics and Molecular Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea [2] Institute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Kyungsoo Jung1] Laboratory of Cancer Genomics and Molecular Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea [2] Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Maruja E LiraOncology Research Unit, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mao MaoOncology Research Unit, Pfizer Worldwide Research and Development, San Diego, CA, USA.
Joungho HanDepartment of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jhingook KimDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yoon-La Choi1] Department of Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea [2] Laboratory of Cancer Genomics and Molecular Pathology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea [3] Institute for Refractory Cancer Research, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea [4] Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The success of crizotinib in ALK-positive patients has elicited efforts to find new oncogenic fusions in lung cancer. These efforts have led to the discovery of novel oncogenic fusion genes such as ROS1 and RET. However, the molecular and clinicopathologic characteristics associated with RET or ROS1 fusion, compared with ALK fusion-positive lung cancer, remain unclear. We accordingly analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics of RET- and ROS1-fusion-positive lung adenocarcinomas. We further performed immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis (FISH) in 15 cases of RET and 9 cases of ROS1 fusion tumors by identified NanoString's nCounter screening. RET fusion-positive patients were younger in age, never-smokers, and in early T stage; ROS1 fusion-positive patients had a higher number of never-smokers compared with patients with quintuple-negative (EGFR-/KRAS-/ALK-/ROS1-/RET-) lung adenocarcinoma. Histologically, RET and ROS1 fusion tumors share the solid signet-ring cell and mucinous cribriform pattern, as previously mentioned in the histology of ALK fusion tumors. Therefore, it can be presumed that fusion gene-associated lung adenocarcinomas share similar histologic features. In immunohistochemistry, the majority of 15 RET and 9 ROS1 fusion-positive cases showed positivity of more than moderate intensity and cytoplasmic staining for RET and ROS1 proteins, respectively. In FISH, the majority of RET and ROS1 rearrangement showed two signal patterns such as one fusion signal and two separated green and orange signals (1F1G1O) and an isolated 3' green signal pattern (1F1G). Our study has provided not only characteristics of fusion gene-associated histologic features but also a proposal for a future screening strategy that will enable clinicians to select cases needed to be checked for ROS1 and RET rearrangements based on clinicohistologic features.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementAdenocarcinomaAdenocarcinoma of LungAdultAgedAge FactorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retYoung AdultOncogene Proteins, FusionProtein-Tyrosine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-retROS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID25234288
OpenAlexW1964917847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.