ReviewSeminars in nuclear medicine2014
Cardiac PET perfusion: prognosis, risk stratification, and clinical management.
Review in Seminars in nuclear medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04475094 (Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Coronary Artery Stenting on Quantitative Myocardial Blood Flow and Health Status
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic value of normal positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.The British journal of radiology · 2017Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of PET Versus SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients with Smaller Left Ventricles: A Substudy of theJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021Trial
- Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2019Trial
- Revisiting Perfusion in the Forgotten Right Ventricle: Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Quantification on PET/CT.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Combined perfusion and metabolic imaging of small cell lung cancer with dual-isotope LAFOV-PET.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Unraveling septal perfusion abnormalities in Ebstein's anomaly: A case report contrasting PET MPI with myocardial reality.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Clinical significance of splenic switch-off in adenosine triphosphateJapanese journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Robust whole-body PET image denoising using 3D diffusion models: evaluation across various scanners, tracers, and dose levels.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Coronary Microvascular Disease Early After Myocardial Infarction: Diagnostic Approach and Prognostic Value-A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Test-retest Assessment of Biventricular Myocardial Oxidative Metabolism and Perfusion in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients UsingMolecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Evaluating Ischemic Heart Disease in Women: Focus on Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (ANOCA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2024Review
- Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction and Hypertension: A Bond More Important than We Think.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Novel Imaging Approaches to Cardiac Manifestations of Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: JACC Scientific Statement.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2023Review
- Coronary vasculopathy due to moyamoya disease.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2023Article
- Utility of positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for identifying ischemia and guiding treatment in patients with anomalous coronary arteries.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Severe myocardial stunning after myocardial perfusion on gated SPECT exercise stress test.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Development, diagnostic performance, and interobserver agreement of aJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Advanced imaging for risk stratification for ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Imaging Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy with Cardiac PET and Cardiac MRI.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with PET has expanded significantly over the past decade. With the wider availability of PET scanners and the routine use of quantitative blood flow imaging, the clinical use of PET MPI is expected to increase further. PET MPI is a powerful tool to identify risk, to quantify risk, and to guide therapy in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. A large body of evidence supports the prognostic value of PET MPI and ejection fraction in intermediate- to high-risk subjects, in women, in obese individuals, and in post-coronary artery bypass grafting individuals. A normal perfusion study indicates low risk (<1% annualized rate of cardiac events of cardiac death and non-fatal myocardial infarction), while an abnormal study indicates high risk. With accurate risk stratification, high-quality images, and quantitation, PET MPI may transform the management of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.