Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233822›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2014

Chorio-retinal thickness measurements in patients with acromegaly.

G Pekel, F Akin, M S Ertürk, S Acer, R Yagci, M C Hıraali, E N Cetin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

G PekelOphthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
F AkinEndocrinology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
M S ErtürkEndocrinology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
S AcerOphthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
R YagciOphthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
M C HıraaliOphthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.
E N CetinOphthalmology Department, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare choroidal, foveal, and peripapillary retinal thickness between patients with acromegaly and healthy adults.

methodsThis prospective, cross-sectional, and comparative study included 30 patients with acromegaly (study group) and 30 healthy subjects (control group). The subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), foveal thickness, and peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness were measured with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.

resultsThe mean SFCT in the study group and in the control eyes was 374.4±98.1 and 308.6±77.3 μm, respectively (P<0.001). The mean thinnest foveal thickness value was 233.2±22.4 μm in the acromegaly group and 222.8±13.9 μm in the control group (P=0.003). The mean peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness did not differ significantly between the groups (P=0.34).

conclusionThe SFCT and foveal thickness were significantly higher in patients with acromegaly, whereas peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness was similar between the groups.

Indexed as

AcromegalyAdultChoroidCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrgan SizeProspective StudiesRetinaTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID25233822
PMCPMC4274297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.