Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233461›Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Visceral leishmaniasis and HIV coinfection in Latin America.

José Angelo Lindoso, Gláucia Fernandes Cota, Alda Maria da Cruz, Hiro Goto, Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-Elkhoury, Gustavo Adolfo Sierra Romero, Márcia Leite de Sousa-Gomes, Joanna Reis Santos-Oliveira, Ana Rabello

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of visceral leishmaniasis among people with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

José Angelo LindosoInstituto de Infectologia Emilio Ribas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil; Laboratório de Soroepidemiologia (LIM-38) Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Mediciina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Gláucia Fernandes CotaHospital Eduardo de Menezes, Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais (FHEMIG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Centro de Pesquisa René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Alda Maria da CruzLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Medicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Disciplina de Parasitologia/FCM-UERJ, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Hiro GotoInstituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Departamento de Medicina Preventiva da Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-ElkhouryPan American Health Organization-World Health Organization (PAHO-WHO), Duque de Caxias, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gustavo Adolfo Sierra RomeroNúcleo de Medicina Tropical, Universidade de Brasilia, Distrito Federal, Brazil; Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Avaliação de Tecnologia em Saúde, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.
Márcia Leite de Sousa-GomesMinistério da Saúde do Brasil, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.
Joanna Reis Santos-OliveiraLaboratório Interdisciplinar de Pesquisas Medicas, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ana RabelloCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRFundação de Ciência e Tecnologia · BRMinistério da Saúde · BRPan American Health Organization (Brasil) · BR

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is an endemic zoonotic disease in Latin America caused by Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum, which is transmitted by sand flies from the genus Lutzomyia. VL occurs in 12 countries of Latin America, with 96% of cases reported in Brazil. Recently, an increase in VL, primarily affecting children and young adults, has been observed in urban areas of Latin America. The area in which this spread of VL is occurring overlaps regions with individuals living with HIV, the number of whom is estimated to be 1.4 million people by the World Health Organization. This overlap is suggested to be a leading cause of the increased number of reported VL-HIV coinfections. The clinical progression of HIV and L. infantum infections are both highly dependent on the specific immune response of an individual. Furthermore, the impact on the immune system caused by either pathogen and by VL-HIV coinfection can contribute to an accelerated progression of the diseases. Clinical presentation of VL in HIV positive patients is similar to patients without HIV, with symptoms characterized by fever, splenomegaly, and hepatomegaly, but diarrhea appears to be more common in coinfected patients. In addition, VL relapses are higher in coinfected patients, affecting 10% to 56.5% of cases and with a lethality ranging from 8.7% to 23.5% in Latin America, depending on the study. With regards to the diagnosis of VL, parasitological tests of bone marrow aspirates have proven to be the most sensitive test in HIV-infected patients. Serologic tests have demonstrated a variable sensitivity according to the method and antigens used, with the standard tests used for diagnosing VL in Latin America displaying lower sensitivity. For this review, few articles were identified that related to VL-HIV coinfections and originated from Latin America, highlighting the need for improving research within the regions most greatly affected. We strongly support the formation of a Latin American network for coinfections of Leishmania and HIV to improve the consistency of research on the current situation of VL-HIV coinfections. Such a network would improve the collection of vital data and samples for better understanding of the clinical manifestations and immunopathogenic aspects of VL in immunosuppressed patients. Ultimately, a concerted effort would improve trials for new diagnostic methodologies and therapeutics, which could accelerate the implementation of more specific and effective diagnosis as well as public policies for treatments to reduce the impact of VL-HIV coinfections on the Latin American population.

Indexed as

BrazilCoinfectionHIV InfectionsHumansLatin AmericaLeishmaniasis, Visceral

Identifiers

PMID25233461
PMCPMC4169383
OpenAlexW2043254099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.