Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233353›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Sensorimotor modulation differs with load type during constant finger force or position.

Hikari Kirimoto, Hiroyuki Tamaki, Makoto Suzuki, Takuya Matsumoto, Kazuhiro Sugawara, Syo Kojima, Hideaki Onishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Gating of Sensory Input at Subcortical and Cortical Levels during Grasping in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hikari KirimotoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Hiroyuki TamakiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Makoto SuzukiSchool of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takuya MatsumotoInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Graduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Kazuhiro SugawaraInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Syo KojimaGraduate School of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan; Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital, Chiba, Japan.
Hideaki OnishiInstitute for Human Movement and Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
Niigata University of Health and Welfare · JPHebei Rehabilitation Hospital · JPKitasato University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: production of a constant force against a rigid restraint (force task), and maintenance of position against a constant load (position task). Previous studies reported that the time to task failure during a fatigue task was twice as long in the force task compared with the position task. Sensory feedback processing may contribute to these differences. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of load types during static muscle contraction tasks on the gating effect, i.e., attenuation of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and the cortical silent period (cSP). Ten healthy subjects contracted their right first dorsal interosseus muscle by abducting their index finger for 90 s, to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a constant position with 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint against the same load (position task). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded from C3' by stimulating either the right ulnar or median nerve at the wrist while maintaining contraction. The cortical silent period (cSP) was also elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Reduction of the amplitude of the P45 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the position task than during the force task and under control rest conditions when the ulnar nerve, but not the median nerve, was stimulated. The position task had a significantly shorter cSP duration than the force task. These results suggest the need for more proprioceptive information during the position task than the force task. The shorter duration of the cSP during the position task may be attributable to larger amplitude of heteronymous short latency reflexes. Sensorimotor modulations may differ with load type during constant finger force or position tasks.

Indexed as

AdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleFingersHand StrengthHumansMaleMuscle ContractionProprioceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25233353
PMCPMC4169486
OpenAlexW2086358447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.