ArticlePloS one2014
Sensorimotor modulation differs with load type during constant finger force or position.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Short latency afferent inhibition differs with load type during isometric finger abduction.Journal of physiological anthropology · 2026Article
- Temporal dynamics of somatosensory gating and facilitation in the primary somatosensory cortex during finger movements.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Article
- Frequency dependence of cortical somatosensory evoked response to peripheral nerve stimulation with controlled afferent excitation.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Force monitoring reveals single trial dynamics of motor control in a stop signal task.Physiological reports · 2024Article
- Effects of repetitive practice of motor tasks on somatosensory gating.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- The relationships between motor behavior and sensory gating in the ball rotation task.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Article
- Cutaneous information processing differs with load type during isometric finger abduction.PloS one · 2022Article
- Dexterous manual movement facilitates information processing in the primary somatosensory cortex: A magnetoencephalographic study.The European journal of neuroscience · 2021Article
- Excitability of the Ipsilateral Primary Motor Cortex During Unilateral Goal-Directed Movement.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2021Article
- Sensory gating and suppression of subjective peripheral sensations during voluntary muscle contraction.BMC neuroscience · 2020Article
- Gating of Sensory Input at Subcortical and Cortical Levels during Grasping in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Cortical contributions to sensory gating in the ipsilateral somatosensory cortex during voluntary activity.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- Effect of muscle contraction strength on gating of somatosensory magnetic fields.Experimental brain research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During submaximal isometric contraction, there are two different load types: production of a constant force against a rigid restraint (force task), and maintenance of position against a constant load (position task). Previous studies reported that the time to task failure during a fatigue task was twice as long in the force task compared with the position task. Sensory feedback processing may contribute to these differences. The purpose of the current study was to determine the influence of load types during static muscle contraction tasks on the gating effect, i.e., attenuation of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) and the cortical silent period (cSP). Ten healthy subjects contracted their right first dorsal interosseus muscle by abducting their index finger for 90 s, to produce a constant force against a rigid restraint that was 20% of the maximum voluntary contraction (force task), or to maintain a constant position with 10° abduction of the metacarpophalangeal joint against the same load (position task). Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) were recorded from C3' by stimulating either the right ulnar or median nerve at the wrist while maintaining contraction. The cortical silent period (cSP) was also elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Reduction of the amplitude of the P45 component of SEPs was significantly larger during the position task than during the force task and under control rest conditions when the ulnar nerve, but not the median nerve, was stimulated. The position task had a significantly shorter cSP duration than the force task. These results suggest the need for more proprioceptive information during the position task than the force task. The shorter duration of the cSP during the position task may be attributable to larger amplitude of heteronymous short latency reflexes. Sensorimotor modulations may differ with load type during constant finger force or position tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.