Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233198›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2014

Comparative phenotypic analysis of the major fungal pathogens Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans.

Linda M Holland, Markus S Schröder, Siobhán A Turner, Heather Taff, David Andes, Zsuzsanna Grózer, Attila Gácser, Lauren Ames, Ken Haynes, Desmond G Higgins and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The metabolic trap:Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fungal biofilms in human health and disease.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role ofJournal of medical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic modification ofMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Contribution ofInfection and drug resistance · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. A common vesicle proteome drives fungal biofilm development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Linda M HollandSchool of Biomedical and Biomolecular Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Markus S SchröderSchool of Biomedical and Biomolecular Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Siobhán A TurnerSchool of Biomedical and Biomolecular Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Heather TaffDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
David AndesDepartments of Medicine and Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Zsuzsanna GrózerDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Attila GácserDepartment of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Lauren AmesSchool of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Ken HaynesSchool of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom.
Desmond G HigginsSchool of Medicine and Medical Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Geraldine ButlerSchool of Biomedical and Biomolecular Science, Conway Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
University College Dublin · IEUniversity of Exeter · GBUniversity of Szeged · HUUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

INTEGRATED TRAINING FOR PHYSICIAN-SCIENTISTST32GM008692 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BURKARD, MARK E · 1998 to 2020
$10.3M
Vesicle-mediated drug resistance of Candida albicans biofilmR01AI073289 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDES, DAVID R, MITCHELL, AARON P · 2008 to 2025
$7.9M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/F005210/1NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073289NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI073289NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008692Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097377/Z/11/ZWellcome Trust 097419/Z/11/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans are human fungal pathogens that belong to the CTG clade in the Saccharomycotina. In contrast to C. albicans, relatively little is known about the virulence properties of C. parapsilosis, a pathogen particularly associated with infections of premature neonates. We describe here the construction of C. parapsilosis strains carrying double allele deletions of 100 transcription factors, protein kinases and species-specific genes. Two independent deletions were constructed for each target gene. Growth in >40 conditions was tested, including carbon source, temperature, and the presence of antifungal drugs. The phenotypes were compared to C. albicans strains with deletions of orthologous transcription factors. We found that many phenotypes are shared between the two species, such as the role of Upc2 as a regulator of azole resistance, and of CAP1 in the oxidative stress response. Others are unique to one species. For example, Cph2 plays a role in the hypoxic response in C. parapsilosis but not in C. albicans. We found extensive divergence between the biofilm regulators of the two species. We identified seven transcription factors and one protein kinase that are required for biofilm development in C. parapsilosis. Only three (Efg1, Bcr1 and Ace2) have similar effects on C. albicans biofilms, whereas Cph2, Czf1, Gzf3 and Ume6 have major roles in C. parapsilosis only. Two transcription factors (Brg1 and Tec1) with well-characterized roles in biofilm formation in C. albicans do not have the same function in C. parapsilosis. We also compared the transcription profile of C. parapsilosis and C. albicans biofilms. Our analysis suggests the processes shared between the two species are predominantly metabolic, and that Cph2 and Bcr1 are major biofilm regulators in C. parapsilosis.

Indexed as

BiofilmsBiomarkersCandidaCandidiasisFungal ProteinsGene Expression ProfilingHumansOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPhenotypeReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, FungalRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionSpecies SpecificityBiomarkersFungal ProteinsRNA, FungalRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID25233198
PMCPMC4169492
OpenAlexW2135962353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.