Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233099›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

DGKI methylation status modulates the prognostic value of MGMT in glioblastoma patients treated with combined radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide.

Amandine Etcheverry, Marc Aubry, Ahmed Idbaih, Elodie Vauleon, Yannick Marie, Philippe Menei, Rachel Boniface, Dominique Figarella-Branger, Lucie Karayan-Tapon, Veronique Quillien and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The Clinical Significance of OFrontiers in neurology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Amandine EtcheverryCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Service de Génétique Moléculaire et Génomique, Rennes, France.
Marc AubryCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Plate-forme Génomique Santé Biogenouest, Biosit, Rennes, France.
Ahmed IdbaihAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM UMRS 975/CNRS UMR 7225/Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Elodie VauleonCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Yannick MarieAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Philippe MeneiCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Service de Neurochirurgie, Angers, France.
Rachel BonifaceCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France.
Dominique Figarella-BrangerAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Timone, Service d'Anatomie Pathologie et de Neuropathologie, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France; INSERM U911, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, France.
Lucie Karayan-TaponINSERM U935, Poitiers, France; Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Laboratoire de Cancérologie Biologique, Poitiers, France.
Veronique QuillienCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Département de Biologie Médicale, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Marc SansonAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM UMRS 975/CNRS UMR 7225/Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Marie de TayracCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Service de Génétique Moléculaire et Génomique, Rennes, France.
Jean-Yves DelattreAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Neurologie 2 Mazarin, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche de l'Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, INSERM UMRS 975/CNRS UMR 7225/Université Pierre-et-Marie-Curie, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle Épinière, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Jean MosserCNRS, UMR 6290, Institut Génétique et Développement de Rennes, Rennes, France; Université Rennes 1, Université Européenne de Bretagne, Biosit, Faculté de Médecine, Rennes, France; Plate-forme Génomique Santé Biogenouest, Biosit, Rennes, France; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Service de Génétique Moléculaire et Génomique, Rennes, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRStructure Fédérative de Recherche en Biologie et Santé de Rennes · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRAssistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRInserm · FRInstitut du Cerveau · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsistently reported prognostic factors for glioblastoma (GBM) are age, extent of surgery, performance status, IDH1 mutational status, and MGMT promoter methylation status. We aimed to integrate biological and clinical prognostic factors into a nomogram intended to predict the survival time of an individual GBM patient treated with a standard regimen. In a previous study we showed that the methylation status of the DGKI promoter identified patients with MGMT-methylated tumors that responded poorly to the standard regimen. We further evaluated the potential prognostic value of DGKI methylation status.

methods399 patients with newly diagnosed GBM and treated with a standard regimen were retrospectively included in this study. Survival modelling was performed on two patient populations: intention-to-treat population of all included patients (population 1) and MGMT-methylated patients (population 2). Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to identify the main prognostic factors. A nomogram was developed for population 1. The prognostic value of DGKI promoter methylation status was evaluated on population 1 and population 2.

resultsThe nomogram-based stratification of the cohort identified two risk groups (high/low) with significantly different median survival. We validated the prognostic value of DGKI methylation status for MGMT-methylated patients. We also demonstrated that the DGKI methylation status identified 22% of poorly responding patients in the low-risk group defined by the nomogram.

conclusionsOur results improve the conventional MGMT stratification of GBM patients receiving standard treatment. These results could help the interpretation of published or ongoing clinical trial outcomes and refine patient recruitment in the future.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingChemoradiotherapyCohort StudiesDacarbazineDiacylglycerol KinaseDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleGlioblastomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingDacarbazineDiacylglycerol KinaseDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTemozolomideTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25233099
PMCPMC4169423
OpenAlexW2141589246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.