Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25233072›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of investigative dermatology2015

Testing chemotherapeutic agents in the feather follicle identifies a selective blockade of cell proliferation and a key role for sonic hedgehog signaling in chemotherapy-induced tissue damage.

Guojiang Xie, Hangwei Wang, Zhipeng Yan, Linyan Cai, Guixuan Zhou, Wanzhong He, Ralf Paus, Zhicao Yue

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of investigative dermatology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Convergence of external and internal stressors on a stress-responsive enhancer of theProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Feather on the Cap of Medicine.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2015
    Article
  16. Drug discovery for alopecia: gone today, hair tomorrow.Expert opinion on drug discovery · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Guojiang XieInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Hangwei WangInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Zhipeng YanInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Linyan CaiInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Guixuan ZhouInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Wanzhong HeNational Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ralf PausInstitute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK,; Department of Dermatology, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany. Electronic address: raw600@gmail.com.
Zhicao YueInstitute of Life Sciences, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, China.
Fuzhou University · CNNational Institute of Biological Sciences, Beijing · CNUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapeutic agents induce complex tissue responses in vivo and damage normal organ functions. Here we use the feather follicle to investigate details of this damage response. We show that cyclophosphamide treatment, which causes chemotherapy-induced alopecia in mice and man, induces distinct defects in feather formation: feather branching is transiently and reversibly disrupted, thus leaving a morphological record of the impact of chemotherapeutic agents, whereas the rachis (feather axis) remains unperturbed. Similar defects are observed in feathers treated with 5-fluorouracil or taxol but not with doxorubicin or arabinofuranosyl cytidine (Ara-C). Selective blockade of cell proliferation was seen in the feather branching area, along with a downregulation of sonic hedgehog (Shh) transcription, but not in the equally proliferative rachis. Local delivery of the Shh inhibitor, cyclopamine, or Shh silencing both recapitulated this effect. In mouse hair follicles, those chemotherapeutic agents that disrupted feather formation also downregulated Shh gene expression and induced hair loss, whereas doxorubicin or Ara-C did not. Our results reveal a mechanism through which chemotherapeutic agents damage rapidly proliferating epithelial tissue, namely via the cell population-specific, Shh-dependent inhibition of proliferation. This mechanism may be targeted by future strategies to manage chemotherapy-induced tissue damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisCell ProliferationChickensDown-RegulationFeathersHair FollicleHedgehog ProteinsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalSignal TransductionAntineoplastic AgentsHedgehog Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25233072
OpenAlexW2086901023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.