Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25232993›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A formal re-description of the cockroach Hebardina concinna anchored on DNA Barcodes confirms wing polymorphism and identifies morphological characters for field identification.

Qiaoyun Yue, Keliang Wu, Deyi Qiu, Jia Hu, Dexing Liu, Xiaoya Wei, Jian Chen, Charles E Cook

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Qiaoyun YueZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Keliang WuZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Deyi QiuZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Jia HuGuangdong Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Dexing LiuZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoya WeiZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Jian ChenZhongshan Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau Technology Center, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China.
Charles E CookThe EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Guangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center (China) · CNEntry Exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau · CNWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHebardina concinna is a domestic pest and potential vector of pathogens throughout East and Southeast Asia, yet identification of this species has been difficult due to a lack of diagnostic morphological characters, and to uncertainty in the relationship between macroptyrous (long-winged) and brachypterous (small-winged) morphotypes. In insects male genital structures are typically species-specific and are frequently used to identify species. However, male genital structures in H. concinna had not previously been described, in part due to difficulty in identifying conspecifics. METHODS/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe collected 15 putative H. concinna individuals, from Chinese populations, of both wing morphotypes and both sexes and then generated mitochondrial COI (the standard barcode region) and COII sequences from five of these individuals. These confirmed that both morphotypes of both sexes are the same species. We then dissected male genitalia and compared genital structures from macropterous and brachypterous individuals, which we showed to be identical, and present here for the first time a detailed description of H. concinna male genital structures. We also present a complete re-description of the morphological characters of this species, including both wing morphs. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This work describes a practical application of DNA barcoding to confirm that putatively polymorphic insects are conspecific and then to identify species-specific characters that can be used in the field to identify individuals and to obviate the delay and cost of returning samples to a laboratory for DNA sequencing.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceCockroachesDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, MitochondrialEvolution, MolecularGenitalia, MaleMaleMitochondriaPolymorphism, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNAWings, AnimalDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID25232993
PMCPMC4169431
OpenAlexW2016220709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.