ReviewGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2015
Genomic screening of the general adult population: key concepts for assessing net benefit with systematic evidence reviews.
Review in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Primary Care and Outcomes of Healthy Adult Patients: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Annals of internal medicine · 2017Trial
- North Carolina primary care provider perspectives on expanded genomic screening in children.BMC medical genomics · 2026Article
- Primary Care Provider Perspectives on Expanded Genomic Screening in Children.Research square · 2025Article
- Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
- Review
- Does genetic testing offer utility as a supplement to traditional family health history intake for inherited disease risk?Family practice · 2023Article
- The Challenge of Genetic Variants of Uncertain Clinical Significance : A Narrative Review.Annals of internal medicine · 2022Review
- Assessing the implications of positive genomic screening results.Personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Population genomic screening of all young adults in a health-care system: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Article
- Age and perceived risks and benefits of preventive genomic screening.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2018Article
- The Ethics of General Population Preventive Genomic Sequencing: Rights and Social Justice.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2018Article
- Which Results to Return: Subjective Judgments in Selecting Medically Actionable Genes.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2017Article
- Is there evidence that we should screen the general population for Lynch syndrome with genetic testing? A systematic review.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2017Review
- The promise and peril of genomic screening in the general population.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2016Article
- Personal Genome Sequencing in Ostensibly Healthy Individuals and the PeopleSeq Consortium.Journal of personalized medicine · 2016Review
- Can targeted genetic testing offer useful health information to adoptees?Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2015Article
- Looking for Trouble and Finding It.The American journal of bioethics : AJOB · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.