ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Sequential therapy versus standard triple therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication in a high clarithromycin resistance setting.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the efficacies of triple, quadruple and sequential antibiotic therapy in eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized controlled trial.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Trial
- The Development of Urease Inhibitors: What Opportunities Exist for Better Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Children?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection: Current and future insights.World journal of clinical cases · 2016Review
- The impact of bismuth addition to sequential treatment on Helicobacter pylori eradication: A pilot study.Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sequential treatment scheme has been developed to overcome resistance problem in H. pylori eradication and favorable results have been obtained. This study compared the results of standard triple therapy with a sequential schema consisting of pantoprazole, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole in a high anti-microbial resistance setting. This retrospective study included subjects that underwent standard or sequential eradication treatment after a diagnosis of biopsy-documented H. pylori infection. Patients either received pantoprazole 40 mg bid, amoxicillin 1000 mg bid and clarithromycin 500 mg bid (PAC) for 10 days, or pantoprazole 40 mg bid and amoxicillin 1000 mg bid (PA) for the first 5 days of the treatment period and were then given pantoprazole 40 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid, and metronidazole 500 mg bid (PCM) in the remaining 5 days. Eradication was tested using urea breath test. The two treatment groups did not differ with regard to H. pylori eradication rate for both ITT population (63.9% versus 71.4% for standard and sequential therapy respectively, P = 0.278) and per protocol population (65.9% versus 74.1% for standard and sequential therapy respectively, P = 0.248). Although a sequential treatment appears to represent a plausible alternative, our findings suggest that alternative schedules may be required in certain populations to achieve higher success rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25232429PMC4161589W267017515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.