Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25232263›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of gastroenterology2014

Otilonium bromide in irritable bowel syndrome: a dose-ranging randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Danuta Chmielewska-Wilkoń, Giorgio Reggiardo, Colin Gerard Egan

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of gastroenterology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Expert Opinion on the Efficacy and Safety of Antispasmodics with a Focus on Irritable Bowel Syndrome.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. New and Investigational Agents for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Current gastroenterology reports · 2015
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danuta Chmielewska-WilkońDanuta Chmielewska-Wilkoń, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gabinet Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego, Szewska, 31-009 Krakow, Poland.
Giorgio ReggiardoDanuta Chmielewska-Wilkoń, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gabinet Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego, Szewska, 31-009 Krakow, Poland.
Colin Gerard EganDanuta Chmielewska-Wilkoń, Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Gabinet Endoskopii Przewodu Pokarmowego, Szewska, 31-009 Krakow, Poland.
Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo examine the efficacy and safety of otilonium bromide (OB) in treatment-sensitive functional irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) clinical parameters.

methodsNinety-three patients (44.8 ± 12.6 years, 69% female) with IBS symptoms complying with Rome II criteria participated in this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, dose-ranging phase I/II study. Patients were administered OB 20 mg (n = 24), 40 mg (n = 23) and 80 mg (n = 23) tid or placebo (n = 23) in 4 parallel groups for 4 wk. Primary efficacy variables included abdominal discomfort, intestinal habits, number of daily evacuations and stool consistency. Secondary efficacy measures included return to regular intestinal habits and global discomfort. Safety was also assessed.

resultsBaseline clinical characteristics were similar among the 4 groups. Although individual parameters such as intensity and frequency of abdominal discomfort, bloating or pain were reduced by OB over the 4 wk, no significant differences were observed between groups. Similarly, no difference was observed between OB treatment or placebo for mucus in stool and incomplete or difficulty of evacuation. However, evacuation frequency was significantly reduced after 4 wk by 80 mg OB compared to placebo (-8.36% for placebo vs -41.9% for 80 mg OB, P < 0.01). While 21.7% of patients in the placebo group experienced regular intestinal habits after 4 wk, this improvement was greater for patients treated with 40 mg OB (P < 0.01 vs placebo). Furthermore, a dose-dependent reduction in frequency of diarrhoea (χ(2)-test for trend = 11.5, P < 0.001) and an increase in normal stool frequency was observed. Combining individual variables into a global discomfort index revealed significant improvement among increasing OB doses, favouring 40 mg (P = 0.013) and 80 mg OB (P = 0.001) over placebo. No difference was observed between frequency of adverse events for placebo vs OB.

conclusionThis dose-ranging study demonstrates that OB at 40 and 80 mg can improve individual and global clinical symptoms of IBS compared to placebo over a 4-wk period.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainAdultDefecationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPolandQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsTime FactorsGastrointestinal AgentsoctyloniumQuaternary Ammonium CompoundsAcute treatmentIrritable bowel syndromeOtilonium bromideSpasmolytic

Identifiers

PMID25232263
PMCPMC4161814
OpenAlexW1973832112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.