Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25232119›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2014

Two distinct interneuron circuits in human motor cortex are linked to different subsets of physiological and behavioral plasticity.

Masashi Hamada, Joseph M Galea, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Paolo Mazzone, Ulf Ziemann, John C Rothwell

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masashi HamadaSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan, mhamada-tky@umin.net.
Joseph M GaleaSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0009-4049
Vincenzo Di LazzaroInstitute of Neurology, Campus Bio-Medico University, 00128 Rome, Italy.
Paolo MazzoneNeurochirurgia CTO, 00145 Rome, Italy, and.
Ulf ZiemannDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, and Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard-Karls-University Tübingen, 72076 Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8372-3615
John C RothwellSobell Department of Motor Neuroscience and Movement Disorders, UCL Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K00414X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

How does a single brain region participate in multiple behaviors? Here we argue that two separate interneuron circuits in the primary motor cortex (M1) contribute differently to two varieties of physiological and behavioral plasticity. To test this in human brain noninvasively, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of M1 hand area to activate two independent sets of synaptic inputs to corticospinal neurons by changing the direction of current induced in the brain: posterior-to-anterior current (PA inputs) and anterior-to-posterior current (AP inputs). We demonstrate that excitability changes produced by repetitive activation of AP inputs depend on cerebellar activity and selectively alter model-based motor learning. In contrast, the changes observed with repetitive stimulation of PA inputs are independent of cerebellar activity and specifically modulate model-free motor learning. The findings are highly suggestive that separate circuits in M1 subserve different forms of motor learning.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellumCross-Over StudiesElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansInterneuronsLearningMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityPyramidal TractsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationmotor cortexmotor learningplasticitytranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID25232119
PMCPMC6705319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.