ArticleLab on a chip2014
The pumping lid: investigating multi-material 3D printing for equipment-free, programmable generation of positive and negative pressures for microfluidic applications.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finger-Actuated Micropump of Constant Flow Rate without Backflow.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Picoliter Droplet Generation and Dense Bead-in-Droplet Encapsulation via Microfluidic Devices Fabricated via 3D Printed Molds.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Article
- A miniaturized 3D printed pressure regulator (µPR) for microfluidic cell culture applications.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Complementary catalysis and analysis within solid state additively manufactured metal micro flow reactors.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Nanomaterial-assisted microfluidics for multiplex assays.Mikrochimica acta · 2022Review
- Droplet microfluidic devices for organized stem cell differentiation into germ cells: capabilities and challenges.Biophysical reviews · 2021Review
- Pushbutton-activated microfluidic cartridge as a user-friendly sample preparation tool for diagnostics.Biomicrofluidics · 2021Article
- The Microfluidic Trainer: Design, Fabrication and Validation of a Tool for Testing and Improving Manual Skills.Micromachines · 2020Article
- 3D Printed Microfluidics.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2020Review
- Passive micropumping in microfluidics for point-of-care testing.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Review
- Sliding walls: a new paradigm for fluidic actuation and protocol implementation in microfluidics.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2020Article
- Autonomous lab-on-a-chip generic architecture for disposables with integrated actuation.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- An open-source programmable smart pipette for portable cell separation and counting.RSC advances · 2019Article
- Slip-driven microfluidic devices for nucleic acid analysis.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Review
- Digital Manufacturing for Microfluidics.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2019Review
- 3D Printing: Applications in evolution and ecology.Ecology and evolution · 2019Review
- Advances in Optical Sensing and Bioanalysis Enabled by 3D Printing.ACS sensors · 2018Review
- A hydrostatic pressure-driven passive micropump enhanced with siphon-based autofill function.Lab on a chip · 2018Article
- Micropipette-powered droplet based microfluidics.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Equipment-free pumping is a challenging problem and an active area of research in microfluidics, with applications for both laboratory and limited-resource settings. This paper describes the pumping lid method, a strategy to achieve equipment-free pumping by controlled generation of pressure. Pressure was generated using portable, lightweight, and disposable parts that can be integrated with existing microfluidic devices to simplify workflow and eliminate the need for pumping equipment. The development of this method was enabled by multi-material 3D printing, which allows fast prototyping, including composite parts that combine materials with different mechanical properties (e.g. both rigid and elastic materials in the same part). The first type of pumping lid we describe was used to produce predictable positive or negative pressures via controlled compression or expansion of gases. A model was developed to describe the pressures and flow rates generated with this approach and it was validated experimentally. Pressures were pre-programmed by the geometry of the parts and could be tuned further even while the experiment was in progress. Using multiple lids or a composite lid with different inlets enabled several solutions to be pumped independently in a single device. The second type of pumping lid, which relied on vapor-liquid equilibrium to generate pressure, was designed, modeled, and experimentally characterized. The pumping lid method was validated by controlling flow in different types of microfluidic applications, including the production of droplets, control of laminar flow profiles, and loading of SlipChip devices. We believe that applying the pumping lid methodology to existing microfluidic devices will enhance their use as portable diagnostic tools in limited resource settings as well as accelerate adoption of microfluidics in laboratories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.