Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25231619›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2014

Auditory evoked fields measured noninvasively with small-animal MEG reveal rapid repetition suppression in the guinea pig.

G Björn Christianson, Maria Chait, Alain de Cheveigné, Jennifer F Linden

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Enhanced deviant responses in patterned relative to random sound sequences.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

G Björn ChristiansonEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Maria ChaitEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom;
Alain de CheveignéLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and École normale supérieure, Paris, France; and.
Jennifer F LindenEar Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom j.linden@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBLaboratoire des Systèmes Perceptifs · FR

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H006958/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In animal models, single-neuron response properties such as stimulus-specific adaptation have been described as possible precursors to mismatch negativity, a human brain response to stimulus change. In the present study, we attempted to bridge the gap between human and animal studies by characterising responses to changes in the frequency of repeated tone series in the anesthetised guinea pig using small-animal magnetoencephalography (MEG). We showed that 1) auditory evoked fields (AEFs) qualitatively similar to those observed in human MEG studies can be detected noninvasively in rodents using small-animal MEG; 2) guinea pig AEF amplitudes reduce rapidly with tone repetition, and this AEF reduction is largely complete by the second tone in a repeated series; and 3) differences between responses to the first (deviant) and later (standard) tones after a frequency transition resemble those previously observed in awake humans using a similar stimulus paradigm.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, AuditoryMagnetoencephalographyNeural InhibitionAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAuditory PerceptionGuinea PigsHumansMaleadaptationmagnetoencephalographyroving standard

Identifiers

PMID25231619
PMCPMC4269717
OpenAlexW2127178414

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.