Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25231533›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2015

Follow-up patterns of cancer survivors: a survey of Canadian radiation oncologists.

Allison Y Ye, Winson Y Cheung, Karen J Goddard, Daniel Horvat, Robert A Olson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Myths and Presumptions About Cancer Survivorship.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2024
    Article
  2. Impact of Cancer Survivorship Care Training on Rural Primary Care Practice Teams: a Mixed Methods Approach.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  3. Cancer survivorship care after curative treatment: Chinese oncology practitioners' practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018
    Article
  5. Bridging the gap from the oncology setting to community care through a cross-Canada environmental scan.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Allison Y YeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Vancouver Cancer Centre, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Winson Y Cheung
Karen J Goddard
Daniel Horvat
Robert A Olson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith continual advancements in cancer care, improved outcomes, and increasing survivors, survivorship has become an important area of research. This project seeks to determine the current status of follow-up care in oncology.

methodsAn electronic survey was sent to the Canadian Association of Radiation Oncology members. Based on brief clinical scenarios pertaining to various survivor populations, questions were posed to determine routine follow-up practices.

resultsOne hundred eleven radiation oncologists (RO) responded (44% response rate); 29% were female, 43% were in practice <10 years, and most of Canada was represented. Most worked in centers with >10 oncologists (69%) and saw >200 new consults per year (78%). Only 10% reported not following their patients routinely, mainly in those with breast cancer. Most would follow their central nervous system, gastrointestinal, head and neck, gynecologic, and genitourinary patients. Lack of resources and a belief that follow-up by family physicians (FPs) is equally effective were the top reasons for not following. Treatment toxicity and possibility of further treatment were the most common reasons for routine follow-up. The majority (55%) would follow patients for <5 years, with 36% for 5-10 years, and a minority (9%) for longer than 10 years; 54% would not change the frequency of follow-up, but 39% would decrease and only 7% would increase follow-up. Some felt transferring more care to other health professionals would require additional training and more guidelines. Survivorship care plans are underutilized.

conclusionsTransfer of follow-up care to FPs is desired and feasible. This would allow for more comprehensive medical care and improve access to care for newly diagnosed patients. The development and usage of survivorship care plans would improve this care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Survivors may be increasingly followed by family physicians. Better coordination between oncologists and family physicians, including the use of survivorship care plans, may facilitate this transition.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedRadiation OncologySurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.