ArticleCerebellum (London, England)2015
Visual scanning area is abnormally enlarged in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.
Article in Cerebellum (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Oculomotor and Vestibular Profile in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Operation of a P300-based brain-computer interface by patients with spinocerebellar ataxia.Clinical neurophysiology practice · 2017Article
- Top-down but not bottom-up visual scanning is affected in hereditary pure cerebellar ataxia.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of paper was to investigate abnormalities in visual scanning using an eye-tracking device with patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 6 (SCA6) and SCA31, pure cerebellar types of spinocerebellar degeneration. Nineteen SCA patients (12 patients with SCA6 and 7 patients with SCA31) and 19 normal subjects in total participated in the study. While the subjects viewed images of varying complexity for later recall, we compared the visual scanning parameters between SCA patients and normal subjects. SCA patients had lower image recall scores. The scanned area in SCA patients was consistently larger than that in normal subjects. The amplitude of saccades was slightly larger in SCA patients than that in normal subjects, although it did not statistically differ between the two groups and correlated significantly with the scanned area in most images in SCA patients. The instability ratio of fixation, reflecting gaze-evoked nystagmus and downbeat nystagmus, was higher in SCA patients than that in normal subjects. Since SCA patients showed low scores despite wide visual scanning, the scanned area is considered to be abnormally enlarged. The larger scanned area in SCA patients was supposed mainly to result from the slightly larger saccade amplitude. Additionally, SCA patients showed prominent fixation disturbances probably due to gaze-evoked nystagmus and downbeat nystagmus. Consequently, SCA patients suffer from recognizing various objects in daily life, probably due to the impaired saccade control and impaired fixation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.