Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25231316›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2014

Effects of human anti-spike protein receptor binding domain antibodies on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralization escape and fitness.

Jianhua Sui, Meagan Deming, Barry Rockx, Robert C Liddington, Quan Karen Zhu, Ralph S Baric, Wayne A Marasco

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Engineered ACE2 receptor traps potently neutralize SARS-CoV-2.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jianhua SuiDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Meagan DemingDepartments of Epidemiology and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Barry RockxDepartments of Epidemiology and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Robert C LiddingtonInfectious and Inflammatory Disease Center, Stanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
Quan Karen ZhuDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Ralph S BaricDepartments of Epidemiology and Microbiology and Immunology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA rbaric@email.unc.edu wayne_marasco@dfci.harvard.edu.
Wayne A MarascoDepartment of Cancer Immunology and AIDS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA rbaric@email.unc.edu wayne_marasco@dfci.harvard.edu.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USHarvard University · USDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USSanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008719 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DARVILLE, TONI, DESHMUKH, MOHANISH P · 1999 to 2023
$15.1M
Broad Spectrum Neutralizing Human Abs to SARS and Related CoronavirusesR01AI085524 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI MARASCO, WAYNE A. · 2010 to 2014
$5.4M
Human Antibodies and Targeted Vaccines Against SARS-CoVU01AI061318 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI MARASCO, WAYNE A. · 2004 to 2008
$3.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI085524NIAID NIH HHS R01AI085524NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI061318NIAID NIH HHS U01-AI061318NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008719
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe receptor binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) glycoprotein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a major target of protective immunity in vivo. Although a large number of neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) have been developed, it remains unclear if a single RBD-targeting nAb or two in combination can prevent neutralization escape and, if not, attenuate viral virulence in vivo. In this study, we used a large panel of human nAbs against an epitope that overlaps the interface between the RBD and its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), to assess their cross-neutralization activities against a panel of human and zoonotic SARS-CoVs and neutralization escape mutants. We also investigated the neutralization escape profiles of these nAbs and evaluated their effects on receptor binding and virus fitness in vitro and in mice. We found that some nAbs had great potency and breadth in neutralizing multiple viral strains, including neutralization escape viruses derived from other nAbs; however, no single nAb or combination of two blocked neutralization escape. Interestingly, in mice the neutralization escape mutant viruses showed either attenuation (Urbani background) or increased virulence (GD03 background) consistent with the different binding affinities between their RBDs and the mouse ACE2. We conclude that using either single nAbs or dual nAb combinations to target a SARS-CoV RBD epitope that shows plasticity may have limitations for preventing neutralization escape during in vivo immunotherapy. However, RBD-directed nAbs may be useful for providing broad neutralization and prevention of escape variants when combined with other nAbs that target a second conserved epitope with less plasticity and more structural constraint. IMPORTANCE: The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) in 2002 and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) in 2012 has resulted in severe human respiratory disease with high death rates. Their zoonotic origins highlight the likelihood of reemergence or further evolution into novel human coronavirus pathogens. Broadly neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) that prevent infection of related viruses represent an important immunostrategy for combating coronavirus infections; however, for this strategy to succeed, it is essential to uncover nAb-mediated escape pathways and to pioneer strategies that prevent escape. Here, we used SARS-CoV as a research model and examined the escape pathways of broad nAbs that target the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the virus. We found that neither single nAbs nor two nAbs in combination blocked escape. Our results suggest that targeting conserved regions with less plasticity and more structural constraint rather than the SARS-CoV RBD-like region(s) should have broader utility for antibody-based immunotherapy.

Indexed as

Neutralization TestsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2AnimalsAntibodies, ViralFemaleHumansImmune EvasionMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMutationPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusVirulenceACE2 protein, humanAce2 protein, mouseAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Antibodies, ViralPeptidyl-Dipeptidase AReceptors, VirusSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

Identifiers

PMID25231316
PMCPMC4248992
OpenAlexW2035135033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.