ReviewDer Pathologe2014
[The spectrum of histomorphological findings related to joint endoprosthetics].
Review in Der Pathologe, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Aseptic loosening of total ankle replacement and conversion to ankle arthrodesis].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2017Trial
- Critical signaling pathways in osteoclast differentiation and bone resorption: mechanisms and therapeutic implications for periprosthetic osteolysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Trend Shift in the Cause of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty over 17 Years.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2023Article
- Analysis of Total Knee Arthroplasty revision causes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2018Article
- [Fifteen years of the histopathological synovitis score : Review and further developments of a diagnostic score].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2017Review
- Allergy in Total Knee Replacement. Does It Exist?: Review Article.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2017Review
- Reasons for failure in primary total knee arthroplasty - An analysis of prospectively collected registry data.Journal of orthopaedicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 230,000 total hip and 170,000 knee joint endoprostheses are implanted in Germany annually of which approximately 10% (i.e. 40,000 interventions per year) are cases of revision surgery. These interventions involve removal of a previously implanted prosthesis which has resulted in complaints and replacement with a new prosthesis. There are manifold reasons for revision surgery, the most common indication being so-called endoprosthesis loosening, which is subdivided into septic and aseptic loosening. Histomorphological studies revealed that periprosthetic tissue from endoprosthesis loosening can be classified into four types (I) wear-particle induced type, (II) infectious type, (III) combined type and (IV) fibrous type. Types I and IV represent aseptic loosening and types II and III septic loosening. Recently, the topic of implant allergy has emerged. The detection of cellular, mostly perivascular lymphocytic infiltrates is discussed as being a sign of an allergic tissue reaction. It has most frequently been observed in type I periprosthetic membranes with a dense load of metal wear, which occurs with metal-on-metal bearings. Apart from endoprosthesis loosening, arthrofibrosis is another complication of joint endoprosthetics and can cause pain and impaired function. Histopathologically, arthrofibrosis can be evaluated by a three-tiered grading system. Furthermore, bone pathologies, such as ossification, osteopenia or osteomyelitis can occur as complications of joint endoprosthetics. This review gives an overview of the whole spectrum of pathological findings in joint endoprosthetics and offers a comprehensive and standardized classification system for routine histopathological diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25230805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.