Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25230021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Ovarian cancer cell line panel (OCCP): clinical importance of in vitro morphological subtypes.

Corine M Beaufort, Jean C A Helmijr, Anna M Piskorz, Marlous Hoogstraat, Kirsten Ruigrok-Ritstier, Nicolle Besselink, Muhammed Murtaza, Wilfred F J van IJcken, Anouk A J Heine, Marcel Smid and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 272 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
272citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
29.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

272 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 410 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

212 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Corine M BeaufortDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jean C A HelmijrDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anna M PiskorzFunctional Genomics of Ovarian Cancer Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Marlous HoogstraatDepartment of Medical Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht The Netherlands.
Kirsten Ruigrok-RitstierDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Nicolle BesselinkDepartment of Medical Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht The Netherlands.
Muhammed MurtazaMolecular and Computational Diagnostics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Wilfred F J van IJckenCenter for Biomics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Anouk A J HeineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel SmidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Marco J KoudijsDepartment of Medical Oncology and Center for Personalized Cancer Treatment, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht The Netherlands.
James D BrentonFunctional Genomics of Ovarian Cancer Laboratory, Cancer Research UK Cambridge Institute, University of Cambridge, Li Ka Shing Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Els M J J BernsDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jozien HellemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBCancer Research UK · GBCenter for Personalized Cancer Treatment · NLErasmus University Rotterdam · NL

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epithelial ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and remains the most lethal gynaecological malignancy in the Western world. Therapeutic approaches need to account for inter-patient and intra-tumoural heterogeneity and detailed characterization of in vitro models representing the different histological and molecular ovarian cancer subtypes is critical to enable reliable preclinical testing. There are approximately 100 publicly available ovarian cancer cell lines but their cellular and molecular characteristics are largely undescribed. We have characterized 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under uniform conditions for growth characteristics, mRNA/microRNA expression, exon sequencing, drug response for clinically-relevant therapeutics and collated all available information on the original clinical features and site of origin. We tested for statistical associations between the cellular and molecular features of the lines and clinical features. Of the 39 ovarian cancer cell lines, 14 were assigned as high-grade serous, four serous-type, one low-grade serous and 20 non-serous type. Three morphological subtypes: Epithelial (n = 21), Round (n = 7) and Spindle (n = 12) were identified that showed distinct biological and molecular characteristics, including overexpression of cell movement and migration-associated genes in the Spindle subtype. Comparison with the original clinical data showed association of the spindle-like tumours with metastasis, advanced stage, suboptimal debulking and poor prognosis. In addition, the expression profiles of Spindle, Round and Epithelial morphologies clustered with the previously described C1-stromal, C5-mesenchymal and C4 ovarian subtype expression profiles respectively. Comprehensive profiling of 39 ovarian cancer cell lines under controlled, uniform conditions demonstrates clinically relevant cellular and genomic characteristics. This data provides a rational basis for selecting models to develop specific treatment approaches for histological and molecular subtypes of ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMicroRNAsNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialOvarian NeoplasmsMicroRNAs

Identifiers

PMID25230021
PMCPMC4167545
OpenAlexW2015030879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.