ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2014
Lynch syndrome screening should be considered for all patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
84 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 240 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of universal screening in major lynch-associated tumors: a systematic review of literature.Familial cancer · 2022Pooled it
- ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2021Guideline
- The proportion of endometrial cancers associated with Lynch syndrome: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019Pooled it
- [Hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes-significance of gynecological cancers].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Hereditary Endometrial Cancer: Lynch Syndrome, Mismatch Repair Deficiency, and Emerging Genetic Predispositions-A Comprehensive Review with Clinical and Laboratory Guidelines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Endometrial cancer molecular classification: research advances and clinical application.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- DNA Methylation in Ovarian and Endometrial Cancers: Predictive and Mechanistic Roles in PARP Inhibitor and ICI Response.Cancer science · 2025Review
- Uterine cancer incidence trends and 5-year relative survival by race/ethnicity and histology among women under 50 years.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2024Article
- Pan-tumor validation of a NGS fraction-based MSI analysis as a predictor of response to Pembrolizumab.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Universal testing in endometrial cancer in Sweden.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2024Article
- Effect of genetic profiling on surgical decisions at hereditary colorectal cancer syndromes.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Article
- Review
- Clinical features and impact of p53 status on sporadic mismatch repair deficiency and Lynch syndrome in uterine cancer.Cancer science · 2024Article
- A metabolic-inflammatory-nutritional score (MINS) is associated with lymph node metastasis and prognostic stratification for endometrial cancer patients.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Integrated machine learning identifies a cellular senescence-related prognostic model to improve outcomes in uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Comparison of immediate germline sequencing and multi-step screening for Lynch syndrome detection in high-risk endometrial and colorectal cancer patients.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2024Article
- A simplified two-marker immunohistochemistry strategy for Lynch syndrome screening in endometrial cancer patients.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2023Article
- Comparison of Methods for Testing Mismatch Repair Status in Endometrial Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Lynch Syndrome and Gynecologic Tumors: Incidence, Prophylaxis, and Management of Patients with Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder caused by germline mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk of developing cancers of the colorectum and endometrium, among others. Given recent recommendations for universal, cost-effective screening of all patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer using MMR protein immunohistochemistry, we evaluated MMR protein expression in a series of endometrial cancers in the general population. A total of 605 consecutive cases of primary endometrial cancer at a single institution (1997 to 2013) were evaluated regardless of age, family history, or histologic features. Evaluation methods consisted of immunohistochemistry for the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2, followed by DNA methylation analysis for cases with MLH1/PMS2 deficiency. Germline mutation testing was performed on a subset of cases. Forty MMR-deficient, nonmethylated endometrial cancers were identified: 3 MLH1/PMS2 and 37 MSH6/MSH2 protein deficiencies. Only 25% occurred in women below 50 years of age (range, 39 to 88 y), 1 of which was in a risk-reducing hysterectomy specimen. Only 15% of patients had a prior history of carcinoma, including only 2 patients with prior colorectal carcinoma. Most (80%) of the endometrial cancers were purely endometrioid; there were 2 mixed endometrioid/mucinous, 1 mucinous, 1 serous, 2 clear cell, and 2 carcinosarcoma cases. When grading was applicable, 40% of the endometrial malignancies were FIGO grade 1, 34% grade 2, and 26% grade 3. Thirteen percent arose in the lower uterine segment, and 23% had tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Of the tumors with known germline testing, 41% with a LS-associated germline mutation were not associated with any of the traditional indicators that have been recommended for LS screening (ie, age 50 y or younger, personal/family cancer pedigree that meets Bethesda guideline criteria, presence of MMR-associated tumor morphology, or location in the lower uterine segment). These data suggest that a significant number of LS-associated endometrial carcinomas are missed using clinical, histologic, and locational screening parameters and provide support for universal screening of all newly diagnosed endometrial cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.