Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25229142›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2014

An engineered membrane to measure electroporation: effect of tethers and bioelectronic interface.

William Hoiles, Vikram Krishnamurthy, Charles G Cranfield, Bruce Cornell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dynamic Electroporation Model Evaluation on Rabbit Tissues.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Highly efficient genome editing of human hematopoietic stem cells via a nano-silicon-blade delivery approach.Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William HoilesDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Vikram KrishnamurthyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: vikramk@ece.ubc.ca.
Charles G CranfieldSchool of Medical and Molecular Biosciences, University of Technology Sydney, Broadway, New South Wales, Australia; Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia.
Bruce CornellSurgical Diagnostics, Roseville, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reports on the construction and predictive models for a platform comprised of an engineered tethered membrane. The platform provides a controllable and physiologically relevant environment for the study of the electroporation process. The mixed self-assembled membrane is formed via a rapid solvent exchange technique. The membrane is tethered to the gold electrode and includes an ionic reservoir separating the membrane and gold surface. Above the membrane, there is an electrolyte solution, and a gold counterelectrode. A voltage is applied between the gold electrodes and the current measured. The current is dependent on the energy required to form aqueous pores and the conductance of each pore. A two-level predictive model, consisting of a macroscopic and a continuum model, is developed to relate the pore dynamics to the measured current. The macroscopic model consists of an equivalent circuit model of the tethered membrane, and asymptotic approximations to the Smoluchowski-Einstein equation of electroporation that is dependent on the pore conductance and the energy required to form aqueous pores. The continuum model is a generalized Poisson-Nernst-Planck (GPNP) system where an activity coefficient to account for steric effects of ions is added to the standard PNP system. The GPNP is used to evaluate the conductance of aqueous pores, and the electrical energy required to form the pores. As an outcome of the setup of the device and the two-level model, biologically important variables can be estimated from experimental measurements. To validate the accuracy of the two-level model, the predicted current is compared with experimentally measured current for different tethering densities.

Indexed as

EngineeringMembranes, ArtificialModels, BiologicalElectrodesElectroporationPoisson DistributionPorosityWaterMembranes, ArtificialWater

Identifiers

PMID25229142
PMCPMC4167528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.