ArticleClinical and translational imaging2014
Role of PET quantitation in the monitoring of cancer response to treatment: Review of approaches and human clinical trials.
Article in Clinical and translational imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Future of Quantitative Breast Imaging: Integrated to Integral Imaging Biomarkers for Precision Cancer Care, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2026Review
- A shortEJNMMI research · 2024Article
- Abbreviated scan protocols to captureEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Article
- PET Use in Cancer Diagnosis, Treatment, and Prognosis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm for PET Image Reconstruction: Concept.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2021Article
- Update on Quantitative Imaging for Predicting and Assessing Response in Oncology.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2020Review
- Quantifying bias and precision of kinetic parameter estimation on the PennPET Explorer, a long axial field-of-view scanner.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2020Article
- NiftyPET: a High-throughput Software Platform for High Quantitative Accuracy and Precision PET Imaging and Analysis.Neuroinformatics · 2018Article
- What Do We Measure in Oncology PET?Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017Review
- Statistical assessment of treatment response in a cancer patient based on pre-therapy and post-therapy FDG-PET scans.Statistics in medicine · 2017Article
- Speeding up PET/MR for cancer staging of children and young adults.European radiology · 2016Article
- Development of Companion Diagnostics.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2016Review
- The engagement of FDG PET/CT image quality and harmonized quantification: from competitive to complementary.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016Article
- The Value of Establishing the Quantitative Accuracy of PET/CT Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) measures of cancer metabolism and cellular proliferation are increasingly being studied as markers of cancer response to treatment, with the goal of using them as predictors of patient therapeutic outcomes - i.e., as surrogate outcome measures. The primary PET radiotracers thus far used for monitoring response of cancer to treatment are
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.