Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228934›Full record

ArticleGMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung2014

German medical students' exposure and attitudes toward pharmaceutical promotion: a cross-sectional survey.

Kristine Jahnke, Marcel Stephan Kremer, Carsten Oliver Schmidt, Michael M Kochen, Jean-François Chenot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Medical education in Germany--work in progress.GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristine JahnkeUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Greifswald, Deuschland.
Marcel Stephan KremerUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Greifswald, Deuschland.
Carsten Oliver SchmidtUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung Study of Health in Pomerania - Klinisch-epidemiologische Forschung (SHIP-KEF), Greifswald, Deuschland.
Michael M KochenUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen, Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Jean-François ChenotUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald, Institut für Community Medicine, Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin, Greifswald, Deuschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEarly contact of medical students with pharmaceutical promotion has been shown in many international studies. We assessed the frequency and places of contact of German medical students to pharmaceutical promotion and examined their attitudes toward pharmaceutical promotional activities.

methodsThis cross-sectional survey was based on a self-developed questionnaire. It was distributed to all clinical students at the University of Goettingen Medical School in 2010. A 4-point rating scale was used to assess the attitudes toward different statements regarding pharmaceutical promotion.

resultsThe overall response rate was 55% (702/1287). The proportion of students with direct contact to pharmaceutical sales representatives increased from 21% in the first clinical year up to 77% in the final year. 60% were contacted during their elective clerkship. 80% had accepted promotional gifts. 86% stated their prescribing behavior to be unsusceptible to the influence of accepting promotional gifts. However, 35% of the unsusceptible students assumed doctors to be susceptible. Almost all (90%) reported that dealing with pharmaceutical promotion was never addressed during lectures and 65% did not feel well prepared for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry. 19% agreed to prohibit contacts between medical students and the pharmaceutical industry.

conclusionsGerman medical students get in contact with pharmaceutical promotion early and frequently. There is limited awareness for associated conflicts of interests. Medical schools need to regulate contacts and incorporate the topic in their curriculum to prepare students for interactions with the pharmaceutical industry.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorDrug IndustryHealth PromotionInterdisciplinary CommunicationAdultClinical ClerkshipConflict of InterestCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcross sectional surveyGermanymedical educationmedical studentsPharmaceutical promotion

Identifiers

PMID25228934
PMCPMC4152996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.