Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228932›Full record

ArticleGMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung2014

Dr. med.--obsolete? A cross sectional survey to investigate the perception and acceptance of the German medical degree.

Xenia Heun, Christian Eisenlöffel, Bastian Barann, Brigitte Müller-Hilke

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Medical education in Germany--work in progress.GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xenia HeunUniversity Medicine Rostock, Institute for Immunology, Rostock, Germany.
Christian EisenlöffelUniversity Medicine Leipzig, Division for Neuropathology, Leipzig, Germany.
Bastian BarannUniversity Medicine Rostock, Institute for Molecular Biology and Medical BiochemistryRostock, Germany.
Brigitte Müller-HilkeUniversity Medicine Rostock, Institute for Immunology, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo obtain the German Medical Degree "Dr.med." candidates are required to write a scientific thesis which is usually accomplished during Medical school education. This extra work load for the students amongst a lack of standardization and an M.D. awarded upon graduation in other European and Anglo-Saxon countries leads repeatedly to criticism of the German system. However, a systematic survey on the perception and acceptance of the German doctoral thesis among those affected is overdue.

methodsUsing an online questionnaire, medical students as well as licensed doctors were asked for the status of their medical degree, their motivation, personal benefit, time and effort, scientific output, its meaningfulness and alternatives concerning their thesis. Patients were asked, how important they value their general practitioner's title "Dr. med.". The resulting data were evaluated performing basic statistic analyses. RESULTS AND

conclusionsThe title "Dr. med." does not seem to be obsolete, but there is room for improvement. The scientific output is good and only a mere 15.1% of the candidates do not publish their results at all. Moreover, while at an early stage motivation, appreciation and recognition of personal benefits from the medical degree are considered as independent aspects, they merge to a general view at later stages. The current practice is considered most meaningful by the ones who have already finished their thesis. However, there are discrepancies between the expected and the actual length as well as the type of the thesis indicating that mentoring and educational advertising need improvement. As for the patients, their educational level seems to correlate with the significance attributed to the title "Dr. med." held by their physician.

Indexed as

Academic Dissertations as TopicAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Cultural ComparisonEducation, MedicalClinical CompetenceCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsStatistics as TopicSurveys and QuestionnairesDissertationDr. med.medical degreequestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID25228932
PMCPMC4152994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.