ReviewEcancermedicalscience2014
Development and assessment of an evidence-based prostate cancer intervention programme for black men: the W.O.R.D. on prostate cancer video.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health promotion interventions for African Americans delivered in U.S. barbershops and hair salons- a systematic review.BMC public health · 2021Pooled it
- Choosing Channels, Sources, and Content for Communicating Prostate Cancer Information to Black Men: A Systematic Review of the Literature.American journal of men's health · 2018Pooled it
- Community voices, strategies to improve understanding, and access to prostate cancer genomic testing.Patient education and counseling · 2026Article
- Feasibility of Establishing Community Living Labs (CoLLabs) to Improve Access to Prostate Health Resources, Education, Amenities, and Community Health: Protocol for a Pragmatic Clinical Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Evaluating a Behavioural Theory-Based Board Game (S-S-LIBOG) Against Traditional Health Talk (HT) in Prostate Cancer Education: Findings from a Quasi-Experimental Study, Plus Introducing 17 Other S-S-LIBOGs.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing public awareness and practice of prostate cancer screening among African men: A scoping review.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2023Article
- Improving Representation of Underrepresented Minority (URM) Students in Oncology Biomedical Research Workforce: Outcome Evaluation from the ReTOOL Program.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022Article
- Prostate Cancer-based Interventions' Efficacy on Knowledge and Adherence Intention to Healthy Lifestyle among Men.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- The Effect of Prostate Cancer Educational Program on the level of Knowledge and Intention to Screen among Jordanian Men in Amman.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2020Article
- Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a Shared Community-Academic HIV Prevention Intervention.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In spite of the numerous prostate cancer (CaP) intervention programmes that have been implemented to address the disparities experienced by black men, CaP prevention, risk reduction, and early detection behaviours remain low among black men. The lack of formal theoretical frameworks to guide the development and implementation of interventions has been recognised as one of the primary reasons for the failure of health interventions. Members of the Florida Prostate Cancer Health Disparity (CaPHD) group employed the Personal Model of Prostate Cancer Disparity (PIPCaD) model and the Health Communication Process Model to plan, implement, and evaluate an intervention programme, the 'Working through Outreach to Reduce Disparity (W.O.R.D. on Prostate Cancer)' video for black men. The location for the video was in a barbershop, a popular setting for the targeted group. The video starred CaP survivors, CaP advocates, a radio personality, and barbers. In addition, remarks were provided by a CaP scientist, a urologist, a CaP advocate, a former legislator, and a minister. The W.O.R.D. video was developed to assist black men in meeting the Healthy People 2020 goal for the United States of America. The efficacy of the W.O.R.D. video was successfully established among 143 black men in Florida. Exposure to the video was found to statistically increase CaP knowledge and intention to participate in CaP screening. Furthermore, exposure to the video statistically decreased participants' perception of the number of factors contributing to decision, uncertainty about CaP screening. Participants were highly satisfied with the video content and rated the quality of the video to be very good. Participants also rated the video as credible, informative, useful, relevant, understandable, not too time consuming, clear, and interesting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.