ReviewEcancermedicalscience2014
Biospecimens, biobanking and global cancer research collaborations.
Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- NCI SEER-Linked Virtual Tissue Repository Pilot.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2024Article
- Assessment of Biobanking Knowledge and Attitudes towards Biospecimen Donation among Healthcare Providers in Saudi Arabia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 biorepository for COVID-19 survivors with and without post-acute sequelae.BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Pathology Laboratory Policies and Procedures for Releasing Diagnostic Tissue for Cancer Research.Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine · 2021Article
- A core collection of pan-schizophrenia genes allows building cohort-specific signatures of affected brain.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Genetic Ancestry Analysis Reveals Misclassification of Commonly Used Cancer Cell Lines.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2019Article
- Cancer oriented biobanks: A comprehensive review.Oncology reviews · 2018Article
- Assessment of knowledge about biobanking among healthcare students and their willingness to donate biospecimens.BMC medical ethics · 2017Article
- Enhancement of Pathologist's Routine Practice: Reuse of DNA Extracted from Immunostained Formalin-fixed Paraffin-embedded (FFPE) Slides in Downstream Molecular Analysis of Cancer.Cancer genomics & proteomicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The disparities in prostate cancer incidence and mortality continue to be a global public health problem. Efforts to address the prostate cancer disparity in black men have been met with a number of challenges, specifically in the accessibility to biospecimens in the context of global prostate cancer collaborations. During the International Educational Workshop at the Science of Global Prostate Cancer Disparities conference held 1-4 November 2012 in Nassau, the Bahamas, an overview of biobanking and biospecimen repositories, and materials transfer in global prostate cancer collaborations were discussed. The challenges faced by low-resource countries were identified, and potential solutions were recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.