Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25228797›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2014

Acute sterile endophthalmitis following intravitreal bevacizumab: case series.

Axel Orozco-Hernández, Ximena Ortega-Larrocea, Gustavo Sánchez-Bermúdez, Gerardo García-Aguirre, Virgilio Morales Cantón, Raul Velez-Montoya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Silicone oil droplets in the vitreous body after intravitreal injection].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Late onset endophthalmitis associated with unexposed glaucoma valved drainage device.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Axel Orozco-HernándezRetina Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Ximena Ortega-LarroceaRetina Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gustavo Sánchez-BermúdezRetina Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Gerardo García-AguirreRetina Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Virgilio Morales CantónRetina Department, Asociación para Evitar la Ceguera en México IAP, Mexico City, Mexico.
Raul Velez-MontoyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Rocky Mountain Lions Eye Institute, Aurora, CO, USA.
Asociacion Para Evitar la Ceguera en México Hospital Dr. Luis Sánchez Bulnes · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the ophthalmological community adopted the use of intravitreal bevacizumab as an accepted off-label treatment for neovascular diseases, the amount of knowledge regarding its effects and properties has been increasing continually. In the last few years, there have been an increasing number of reports about sterile intraocular inflammation and intraocular pressure elevations after intravitreal bevacizumab. In the following case series, we describe the clinical presentation and outcomes of ten consecutive cases of patients developing mild-to-severe sterile intraocular inflammation after intravitreal bevacizumab and their management.

methodsThis report presents a retrospective case series. We reviewed the medical records of ten consecutive patients from a group of 46, in whom repackaged bevacizumab in individual aliquots from two vials from the same batch were used. All surgical procedures were performed using standard sterile techniques in the operating room. At each follow-up visit, patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination including visual acuity assessment, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopy, and posterior fundus examination.

resultsTen patients presented sterile endophthalmitis with an onset time of 3.5±1.95 days. The clinical characteristics were mild pain, slight visual loss, conjunctival hyperemia, and various degrees of intraocular inflammation with microhypopyon. All cultures were negative. All patients were managed with topical steroids and antibiotics, except two, in whom, due to severe vitreous cells, intravitreal antibiotics were used. Three patients showed a transient elevation of intraocular pressure. Only 50% of the patients regained a visual acuity equal or better to the baseline visual acuity on file.

conclusionThe increasing number of intravitreal injections of bevacizumab applied every day, due to its widespread acceptance, might be one reason why the number of cases of sterile endophthalmitis is rising. Fast recognition and accurate differential diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary treatments and long-term complications. The low incidence of this event should not preclude the use of intravitreal injections in eyes that could benefit greatly from this therapy.

Indexed as

bevacizumabcomplicationsintravitreal antibioticspseudoendophthalmitisvitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID25228797
PMCPMC4164286
OpenAlexW1986383304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.